The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling - Chapter 5: The Tweets

🎁Amazon Prime 📖Kindle Unlimited 🎧Audible Plus 🎵Amazon Music Unlimited 🌿iHerb 💰Binance

Hello, dear listener. I’m Megan, host of this series. And before we get into the show,

I wanted to take a minute to tell you about our sponsor, FIRE, the Foundation for Individual

Rights and Expression. We live in a moment when free speech, the bedrock of our democracy

and of all free societies, is often viewed as suspect, where many argue that the right

to free speech is too dangerous, and that even listening to ideological opponents is

morally wrong. Many people just don’t see a problem with using the law, corporate power,

and even extraordinary social pressure to censor viewpoints they disagree with.

But many of us feel the costs of all this in our everyday lives. We feel it when we

self-censor, afraid to say what we really think, sometimes even in private conversations

with friends or loved ones. We feel it when we opt out of a growing number of public discussions,

afraid of the potential cost to our jobs and even our relationships.

FIRE shares a mission with this show, to remind us why a culture of free speech and open dialogue

matters. And regardless of how loud the calls for censorship are, FIRE’s defense of that

culture is unshakable and invaluable. And if you want to remember why we choose freedom,

even for people we strenuously disagree with, you can learn more about FIRE’s incredible

work at And now, on to the show.

This episode contains explicit language and references to sexual violence. It is not suitable

for young listeners.

So when I first became interested and then deeply troubled by what I saw as a cultural

movement that was illiberal in its methods and was very questionable in its ideas, I

absolutely knew that if I spoke out, many people who had loved my books would be deeply

unhappy with me. I knew that. I knew because I knew that they, I could see that they believed

they were living the values that I had espoused in those books. I could tell that they believed

they were fighting for underdogs and difference and fairness. And I thought it would be easier

not to. You know that this could be really bad. And honestly, it has been bad. Personally,

it has not been fun. And I have been scared at times for my own safety and I overwhelmingly

for my family’s safety. Time will tell whether I’ve got this wrong. I can only say that I’ve

thought about it deeply and hard and long. And I’ve listened, I promise, to the other

side. And I believe absolutely that there is something dangerous about this movement

and it must be challenged.

Chapter five, the tweets. Let’s talk about the tweets.

Let’s talk about them.

On the 19th of December, 2019, J.K. Rowling finally jumped into the public conversation

around sex and gender. By that point, she’d spent years following the debate and had become

increasingly concerned about what she saw as a vocal group of trans rights advocates

unfairly targeting feminists who disagreed with them. So she weighed in with a tweet.

Would you be willing to read the tweet that you wrote that day?

Yeah. I tweeted, dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with

any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But

force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real.

Hashtag, I stand with Maya. Hashtag, this is not a drill.

What did you want to accomplish with that tweet?

This tweet was in response to the Maya Forstater case.

Maya Forstater had posted a series of messages on social media

opposing the government’s proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act.

Maya Forstater posted a number of tweets expressing her beliefs and her contract

with her employer was not renewed after a number of her colleagues complained.

The incident that would finally push Rowling into speaking publicly involved a woman named

Maya Forstater, who had spoken out online against the so-called self-ID proposal in the UK.

She asserted that biological sex was unchangeable and that this law would undermine women’s rights.

After posting tweets like men cannot change into women,

she was accused of offensive language and lost her job.

She was called a bigot, a transphobe, and a danger to trans people. Some of her colleagues complained

and ultimately the non-profit where she worked did not renew her contract. And so she decided

to fight this, claiming that she’d been the victim of unlawful discrimination.

Disagreement is not harassment. People can have different views and we ought to be able to talk

about them. This is Forstater speaking with a journalist for Sky News. Gender-critical belief,

which is the absolutely ordinary belief about sex, that your mother and your grandmother are women,

that being female is a thing, is worthy of respect in a democratic society. And people

who hold that belief shouldn’t be discriminated against or harassed for expressing it.

In the UK, they have what’s known as an Employment Tribunal, which is a dedicated

part of the legal system that exclusively deals with disputes between employers and employees.

When Forstater took her former employer to this court, she said that, as a citizen of a democracy,

she had a right to voice her criticism of a proposed law in public. But a few of her

colleagues saw her words as crossing the line into transphobia. Forstater’s comments in dispute

before the court read, in part, everyone’s equality and safety should be protected,

but women and girls lose out on privacy, safety, and fairness if males are allowed into changing

rooms, dormitories, prisons, and sports teams. She also wrote, of course, in social situations,

I would treat any trans women as an honorary female and use whatever pronouns, etc. I wouldn’t

try to hurt anyone’s feelings, but I don’t think people should be compelled to play along with

literal delusions like trans women are women. In December 2019, the judge ruled against Forstater.

In the published ruling, he wrote that Forstater’s belief, quote,

is not a philosophical belief protected by British law. He wrote, I consider that the

claimant’s view, in its absolutist nature, is incompatible with human dignity and fundamental

rights of others. The judgment said that basically her speech in this case could not be protected

because it was not worthy of respect in a democratic society. This is Kathleen Stock,

a philosopher, writer, and for many years, a professor at the University of Sussex.

This was shocking to me, very shocking to me, because it, first of all, it seemed like the

judge had completely lost the plot. Secondly, it made a big material difference to any other woman

who was in a employment situation and who went online to express reasonable worries about a

policy that says that any man can legally become a woman just by saying that he is.

Over the past few years, Stock has become one of the most vocal academics in all of the UK

on behalf of the feminist side in the debate about self-ID. And she saw this ruling as a

danger to free speech in a democratic society. So I then went to my blog, In a Fury, really,

and typed out quite a short piece called This Is Not a Drill.

In the hours after the ruling, she wrote a call to action, directed at her fellow academics.

So I made a call in this blog post to them directly, I call upon you to stand up and say

that there should be free speech on this issue. And I was always very careful to distinguish

between the position of someone like Maya, who thinks that there are significant problems

with the idea you can change your sex, for instance, and the right of us to say it,

even if we’re wrong. So my plea to academics was to stand up for the principle that you

should be legally permitted to believe and say that biological sex is immutable,

without fear of losing your job. Even if it turns out that we’re wrong,

we should still absolutely have the right to say it.

The whole point of a university is to contest groupthink or received wisdom.

Maybe that contestation will only serve to reinforce the groupthink, but at least it

would have been tested. And it has to be tested because there’s so many instances from history

of where groupthink can go wrong, severely wrong, either empirically or ethically.

So academics should have the central role in the culture of testing received wisdom and

introducing controversial ideas in order that they may be rationally and empirically discussed.

And while this post didn’t cause a flood of support from her colleagues,

it very quickly found its way to J.K. Rowling.

The conclusion was reached that her belief that sex is fundamentally immutable was not

worthy of respect. You couldn’t hold that as a philosophical belief.

Seeing other feminists stand up in support of Maya and against the notion that a person might

have to lose their job just for stating this view, Rowling decided that the time had come

for her to speak up. I felt that the tribunal was wrong.

I think there is, in my view, considerable evidence for the fact that a woman is

the producer of the large gametes. And I found it outrageous that this employment tribunal had

decided, no, that belief wasn’t worthy of respect. So I decided I’m standing up.

I’m standing up right now. I’m done.

I drafted the tweet and then I was considerate enough to phone my management team and say,

uh, you cannot argue me out of this. And I read out what I was about to say

because I felt they needed warning because I knew it was going to cause a massive storm.

I tweeted, dress however you please, call yourself whatever you like,

sleep with any consenting adult who will have you.

Within seconds of her hitting publish, the replies started pouring in.

And I knew what was coming. And sure enough, it came.

Within hours, GLAAD, an organization that praised Rowling as a writer who helped LGBT fans find

their identities and communities, said, J.K. Rowling has aligned herself with an

anti-science ideology that denies the basic humanity of people who are transgender.

Amnesty International, a place where Rowling had actually worked for a time in her 20s

and which she credits as having a profound effect on her worldview,

tweeted facepalm emojis along with, just in case anyone needs reminding,

trans rights equal human rights, over and over again.

There were a lot of people who were genuinely troubled and they posted sincere questions

about what Rowling was thinking, like the actress Mara Wilson, who asked,

what exactly is to be gained by using your platform to be cruel and exclusionary to one

of the world’s most vulnerable populations? And many of those responding were among the

most passionate fans of Harry Potter. I have been a huge fan of yours for as

long as I can remember, and it breaks my heart to see this.

Such a shame that you’ve become the evil that you taught so many of us to stand up to.

You’re on the wrong side of history with this one. I hope you come to realize this with time.

Your open disdain towards the trans community is the most disappointing revelation my generation

has witnessed regarding people we once looked up to. This makes me so sad for millions of children

that grew up reading your books. Trans women are women, and you have broken this heart that

your book so often healed. As a gay man that found safety in Hogwarts throughout my childhood,

knowing that trans people wouldn’t be able to have that safety breaks my heart.

MuggleNet, the original Harry Potter fan site that Rowling had embraced all those years ago,

published a statement alongside a trans rights flag saying,

we want every single Potter fan out there to know that the MuggleNet community stands with you.

We see you. We hear you. We support you.

Harry Potter conference runners, YouTubers, and podcasts started tweeting things like,

I am baffled that the woman who created such a loving, welcoming, and accepting community

can be openly transphobic. I don’t understand how you can write seven books about acceptance,

but then not accept everyone. It’s truly disappointing.

From the outside, it really looked like the entire Harry Potter internet world,

these people who had largely placed you on this pedestal in a way that you said made you

uncomfortable, was now saying you were a disgrace. Yeah. There was absolutely fury

and incomprehension. We talked about this before when you got that criticism from the right,

and it was so wide of the mark, as you say, that it didn’t really touch you.

I wondered, did it feel that way from the left as well?

No, because if it’s coming from people that you would, well, you would have thought were allies.

Yes, that’s absolutely going to hit differently, but I don’t hold myself-

Because you share those fundamental values.

Yeah, because I would assume we share certain values. So yeah, that hits differently. Of course

it hits differently. But at the same time, I have to tell you a ton of Potter fans

were still with me. And in fact, a ton of Potter fans were grateful that I’d said what I said.

It’s hard to measure the weight of supporters versus detractors over something like a tweet.

But it is true that Rowling’s post, which was retweeted and liked by hundreds of thousands

of people, had many responses in support and appreciation. They said things like,

the number of likes for this tweet will never convey to you how much it mattered that you were

willing to tweet it. It felt like you stood with ordinary women and men who support them as well

as with Maya. And it was a joy and a relief that the woman who gave us Harry Potter was prepared

to do that. Rowling also told me that she received thousands of private emails of support to her fan

mail address, many of them saying that the sender was too scared to post publicly on Twitter. And

she shared some of these with me with names redacted. And Rowling’s post seemed to surprise

and encourage several of the feminists who’d been targeted by campaigns to get them removed

from their jobs and by protests. Women like Kathleen Stock. I was delighted to see, absolutely

delighted, because at the time it felt very like there was just a bunch of relatively insignificant

women, including myself, howling into the void about it, to be honest, and getting no traction in the

media, getting no traction politically. Everyone treating us as if we were just total deplorables,

which we were not. What’s interesting is the fans that found themselves in positions of power

online, did they feel they needed to take this position because they themselves had followers?

Possibly. I don’t know. I mean, I do know that there is huge pressure on people to take certain

positions at the moment, and I know that there is a huge amount of fear around it.

Some of them, I don’t doubt, sincerely felt it. They just couldn’t understand. Why? Why? Why aren’t you

simply repeating trans women are women? Why aren’t you doing that? That is the kind and good and

righteous thing to do. I don’t understand. And I’m constantly told I don’t understand my own books.

I’m constantly told that I have betrayed my own books. My position is that I’m absolutely

upholding the positions that I took in Potter. My position is that this activist movement,

in the form that it’s currently taking, echoes the very thing that I was warning against in Harry Potter.

You know, I’ve been trying to hold out that, like, this person who created a universe that led to this

community that has meant so much to me and taught me so many of these values of tolerance and

acceptance and unconditional love, like, that she wouldn’t really believe this, right? No way.

This is Jackson Bird, an author whose memoir tells the story of how his Harry Potter fandom

helped him find his true self. After Rowling’s tweet, he wrote an essay for the New York Times

titled, Harry Potter Helped Me Come Out as Trans, But J.K. Rowling Disappointed Me. But as you can

hear in this excerpt from his appearance on Pottercast, like many fans in December 2019,

he wasn’t ready to totally turn his back on Rowling. In some way, like, I try to put myself

in her shoes and I’m like, well, you know, she probably lives in this kind of bubble, you know,

when you are that wealthy and you’ve had so much success, like, you’re not necessarily going to be

meeting all kinds of different people in your life. And it is a confusing topic. And so maybe

she came across this stuff from turf land and it made a little bit of sense to her. And she is such

a staunch feminist. And so she kind of fell for some of it, maybe. And I still kind of want to

believe that. I want to believe that after she gets over whatever defensiveness she’s going to have

from this reaction, maybe she will be willing to listen and learn and grow a little bit.

But then she tweeted again. Only this time,

it was during the chaotic political moment that was the summer of 2020.

We’ll be right back.

This podcast is supported by Athletic Greens. I am a person who can be pretty obsessive about

my health. My routine typically includes things like 10,000 steps a day and smoothies and strength

workouts. And yes, I am even one of those people who forces myself to take cold showers,

even in the winter. But a lot of that flew out the window when I had a baby six months ago,

and I especially struggled to make sure that I was getting good nutrition.

That’s why I was so excited to add AG1 from Athletic Greens to my routine.

I love that I can get 75 vitamins, minerals, and nutrients from whole food sources

just by adding a scoop of AG1 to my smoothie in the morning or mixing it with a glass of

cold water. It’s a really simple habit to get into, and it’s so much easier than swallowing

a bunch of pills, which is what I did for years and came to completely dread.

AG1 is different, and it makes me feel grateful that even during the most chaotic times in my life,

I can do this small, powerful thing to help me cover my nutritional bases every day.

If you’re looking for an easier way to take supplements, Athletic Greens is giving you a

free one-year supply of vitamin D and five free travel packs with your first purchase.

Go to slash witchtrials. That’s slash witchtrials.

Check it out.

This podcast is supported by

I had to make a confession to my husband before I married him.

I do not have a good history with plants, specifically with keeping them alive.

And now that our daughter is four years old, I wanted to make sure that my

arboreal deficiencies aren’t passed along for another generation.

And here’s where comes in. showed us our growing zone based on our location,

and then we used the plant finder to help us choose the perfect trees for little hands to help tend.

And for people like me, who sadly miss the genes for a green thumb, has plant experts who curate thousands of easy-to-grow plant,

shrub, and tree varieties for each unique climate,

from apple trees to evergreens and everything in between.

Plus, their plant experts are always available to help keep our plants growing healthy

throughout the season and beyond.

And I can’t wait to harvest our Meyer lemons and key limes with my little girl when the time comes.

You can join over 1.5 million happy Fast Growing Trees customers by going to slash witchtrials now to get 15% off your entire order.

Get 15% off at slash witchtrials.

After that single tweet in December of 2019 and the backlash from many fans,

J.K. Rowling and her Twitter account went quiet.

She didn’t release any statements.

She didn’t respond to either supporters or critics.

And although the story of the fans disappointed in her

made its way around the world in news articles and tabloids,

the story seemed to fade from public consciousness pretty quickly.

There were no widespread calls for boycotts.

Her book sales did not suffer.

And quickly, much bigger stories dominated the world’s attention.

We do have breaking news tonight,

a deeply divided moment playing out in American history as we come on the air.

President Trump has just been impeached on both Article 1 abuse of power.

The very same week that Rowling sent her I stand with Maya tweet.

Now Donald Trump has become only the third U.S. president to be impeached.

The American president was impeached for the first time since Clinton in the 90s.

It’s the single greatest witch hunt in American history,

probably in history, but in American history.

And then…

China has more than 200 confirmed cases of coronavirus, it’s called.

A new virus was spreading around the world.

A SARS-like virus, which has infected hundreds in China,

has now reached the United States.

The World Health Organization has officially called it COVID-19.

A virus is more powerful in creating political,

economic and social upheaval than any terrorist attack.

The virus’s spread then led to lockdowns around the world.

From this evening, I must give the British people a very simple instruction.

You must stay at home.

Offices were closed, schools closed, churches closed,

restaurants, bars, beaches and even public parks.

People stayed home and, according to data that came out later,

they were spending more time online, and especially on social media, than ever before.

Days turned into weeks. Weeks turned into months.

And by May, anti-lockdown protests started erupting around the world.

We do not consent! We do not consent!

I’ve had enough of being told what I can and cannot do.

I want to be free! I want to live my life!

I want all my friends to live their lives!

Then, a video came out of a white police officer

kneeling on the neck of a Black citizen named George Floyd.

Black lives matter! Black lives matter!

Outrage spread across the country.

No justice! No peace! No justice! No peace!

Then, the world.

Mass protests here in the United States have sparked a global movement

against racial discrimination.

Leading to one of the largest protest movements of the 21st century.

But also…

You can see police here now firing tear gas into the crowd.

They are trying to push these folks back.

Fuck police! Fuck police!

The most costly and deadly riots in America since the L.A. riots in the 90s.

Earlier today, just a few blocks away, there was looting underway nearby.

Police seem to have had enough.

The social contract is broken!

You broke the contract!

As far as I’m concerned, they can burn this bitch to the ground.

Don’t shoot! Don’t shoot! Don’t shoot!

This unrest was also present online,

where social media was full of outrage and anger and uncertainty

about COVID-19 and its origins.

About racial discrimination.

About racism in the U.S. and what should be done to remedy it.

About the gap between the haves and the have-nots.

And about whether the current systems could remedy these problems,

or whether those systems needed to be dismantled entirely.

There was a reckoning about the past, about historical figures and their statues,

but also about prominent people in the present.

We live in a time now where we have to be very careful about what we say.

We have what we call cancel culture, man.

If you do something wrong, you’re supposed to be out of here.

And it could have been five minutes ago, or it could have been 20, 30 years ago.

When a Twitter mob wants to cancel somebody,

they’re basically saying that a person has done something harmful.

Famous journalists and writers faced backlashes over tweets and op-eds and lost their jobs.

Actors and musicians faced backlashes for insensitive lyrics or jokes

and released apology videos.

And it was into this environment that on June 6th, 2020,

J.K. Rowling tweeted again.

So can you set this up for me?

Like, where were you?

I was angry.

I was getting really angry.

What happens was I flipped open Twitter and I saw this article.

It was actually at the top of my feed.

Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.

This article that Rowling saw was using this sort of language that’s become

both more common and more polarizing in recent years,

where outlets avoid using gendered words like women or mothers,

and instead use phrases like cervix havers, uterus havers, or pregnant people,

or in this case, people who menstruate.

The idea is that it’s more inclusive to those who don’t identify as women,

but who are still experiencing things like menstruation or pregnancy.

But to many feminists, it’s also seen as

removing women from the center of experiences that directly affect them.

You know, there is power to words with history, both good and ill.

And to me, the word woman has its own power.

And I do not believe we can meaningfully analyze the harms done to women and girls

without using language that has concrete meaning.

And I felt there’s an obfuscation here.

Now, I’m coming to that article on the background of what I see as

huge injustice and people trying to shut women down.

And I don’t doubt that I too was being affected by

the incredibly febrile, oppressive atmosphere that we are all currently living in.

And that was inflaming my sense of injustice on behalf of women.

Rowling, just like so many others over the COVID lockdowns,

had been spending more time online, in her case on Twitter.

And there, she continued to see how many women labeled as TERFs

were attacked as hate figures and told to shut up and go away,

and sent threats of violence and harassment day in and day out.

So I was angry and I was flippant.

So seeing this article, she just reacted.

You’ll notice there was no courtesy call to my management at this point.

And a few seconds later, she sent a tweet to her 14 million followers.

And I tweeted in quotes,

people who menstruate.

I’m sure there used to be a word for those people.

Someone help me out.

And that was like dropping a hand grenade into Twitter.

Did I mean to drop a hand grenade in?


I was just keeping a rein on my own fury.

So off we went.

J.K. Rowling is back at her bullshit again.

Nope, men have periods too.

Stop hating trans people, you awful weirdo.

And again, within seconds.

You fucking suck.

It’s a fact that women can have penises and men can have vaginas.

The responses started pouring in.

Eat shit.

At J.K. Rowling, shut the fuck up, TERF.

You are ruining my childhood.

First of all, eat shit and die, you TERF-ass bastard.

Only this time, there were magnitudes more, and more enraged.

Never thought I would say this, but here we are.

Fuck you, J.K.

Your reductivism is harmful and ignorant.

At J.K. Rowling, fuck you.

Shut the fuck up, you transphobic piece of shit.

A transphobic piece of shit.

Journalists and media figures started responding.

God, you’re awful.

Good night and shut up.

I actually appreciate how much you are honest about being a huge fucking TERF,

so that no one is confused about whether or not you’re awful.

Doubling down on your TERF-ness.

You are pathetic and embarrassing.

Your unapologetic ignorance is vile.

Celebrities with huge followings like Jameela Jamil and Halsey

tweeted that J.K. Rowling had ruined her legacy.

Jonathan Van Ness shared a viral meme that said,

Harry Potter and the audacity of this bitch.

Christ, you are such a colossal disappointment.

And it just kept going.

You are foul.

What a nasty piece of work you are.

I used to love your books.

You absolutely disgust me.

TERF, your hatred is a stench.

But this time, instead of just sending the tweet and walking away,

Rowling started to try to engage with her critics.

I responded with,

If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction.

If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.

I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex

removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives.

It isn’t hate to speak the truth.

Now, I stand by every word that I wrote there,

but the question is, what is the truth?

And I’m arguing against people who are literally saying sex is a construct.

It’s not real.

She tried to clarify that first flippant tweet and wrote,

I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them.

I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans.

At the same time, my life has been shaped by being female.

I do not believe it’s hateful to say so.

And yet, the more she responded, the more the criticism grew.

I literally cannot wrap my head around the fact that it is a global pandemic right now.

There is like a fucking revolution going on.

And JK Rowling sat down and thought, hmm, now is a good time to be transphobic.

Within minutes, the responses were moving from Twitter to other platforms,

like YouTube and TikTok.

It is highly problematic that this woman came out on Twitter

as a full-blown transphobe in the middle of a civil rights revolution.

Let’s talk about how JK Rowling has been a piece of shit for a hot ass minute,

but we were all just too young and jaded and infatuated with Harry Potter to really see it.

JK Rowling, I hate you so much. I hate you so much. You’re awful.

As you’re tweeting these things, how do you feel it’s going?

Well, I think it’s important to say that I’m not sitting there thinking,

how am I doing here? How am I positioning myself as though I’m a brand?

I am talking and thinking and feeling as an individual human being.

Reading it now today, I’m amazed that I was pretty measured

because I wasn’t feeling measured at this point.

A lot of things had come together and I found it very enraging to watch hashtag be kind

attached to tweets that I thought were utterly dehumanizing of women,

utterly scathing about women’s concerns.

JK Rowling is a whore.

Kindly fuck off, you turf cunt, you hateful, spiteful, ignorant hag.

Rowling had said that part of the reason she spoke up

was seeing the way that other women were harassed when they spoke up.

And now, that same harassment was coming for her.

At JK Rowling, choke on cock.

I’d really just love to fucking punch JK Rowling in her thick rectangle head.

JK Rowling, the transphobic fuck, can suck my dick and choke on it.

God, JK Rowling can gargle my cock and balls and hopefully choke on them right there and then

so she can die and never write another absolutely inane transphobic tweet ever again.

I do watch this movement behaving towards women in ways that I think are absolutely abhorrent.

As she read tweet after terrible tweet,

far from changing her mind, they all seemed to serve as evidence,

as confirmation that her concerns were justified.

Well, this is it, you see, because the turf is by her nature a hate-filled bigot.

Being a turf is evil.

At JK Rowling, you’re a turf and need to be stoned.

She’s evil. She is evil. And that is said openly.

I mean, it is very biblical language that is used of women who say,

you know what, I think any measure that makes it easier for predators to get at

women and girls is a bad idea. That’s, you know, and that there are plenty of women who don’t even,

I wouldn’t identify themselves as feminists who are very concerned about this.

But once you’ve internalized the idea of women and girls,

but once you’ve internalized the idea that a turf is vermin and scum and all the other

words that are used, and that it’s an easy step to punch all turfs, I kill turfs,

this baseball bat will be used to smash, I’ve literally seen there is no point

in arguing with a turf. We need to make them too frightened to speak.

As all these tweets and other responses are coming in, and you’re sitting there reading them,

how did you feel?

How did I feel? Was it nice? Was it fun? No, it’s horrible. It’s horrible to,

because it’s the scale. I think people who have never been in that position, it is the scale.

Even though I knew it was coming, but that’s like knowing you’re about to be punched. You know,

this is going to really hurt. It’s still, you know, you really need to take the punch to know

how much it hurts. Was it fun? No. Was I enjoying myself? No.

When my producers and I started going through the responses to Rowling’s tweets,

even though we knew there’d be many threats and unhinged comments because,

of course, this is the internet, we weren’t prepared for the sheer volume

of violent sexual threats that we found. It’s hard to know exact numbers because

Twitter has a policy of removing these tweets. But by our count, on top of the thousands that

we saw that are still public, hundreds more have either been deleted by Twitter

or removed by the authors. Even if you just go to Twitter right now and type in J.K. Rowling’s name,

you’ll see that these sorts of comments are seemingly endless. And they aren’t just coming

from online trolls writing from behind anonymous profiles. And they didn’t just stay online.

Rowling’s home address was doxed, and law enforcement contacted her to say they were

investigating credible threats of violence. And Rowling, in response to the hostility

flowing in her direction, posted a tweet that read, Feminazi. Turf. Bitch. Witch.

Times change. Woman hate is eternal. But that just led to hundreds of people accusing her,

one of the wealthiest, most privileged women in the world, of trying to paint herself as a victim.

Over the next 48 hours, the denunciations continued. There was a torrent of negative

headlines in news outlets around the globe calling her transphobic. Then,

the actors who’d starred in the Harry Potter films began releasing statements and distancing

themselves from her, including Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and Bonnie Wright,

all of whom had known Rowling since they were children.

Some of the voices who’ve been critical include the stars of her own movie,

including the biggest star, Daniel Radcliffe. That’s right. Harry Potter himself responded.

And in that statement, he wrote, transgender women

are women. Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people.

Warner Brothers, the studio that released the Harry Potter films, released a statement that

didn’t denounce JK by name, but said they support the trans community and inclusivity.

On June 10, 2020, four days after her initial tweets,

Rowling published an essay on her website, expanding on her views.

This isn’t an easy piece to write, she begins, for reasons that will shortly become clear.

But I know it’s time to explain myself on an issue surrounded by toxicity.

I write this without any desire to add to that toxicity.

She then listed her reasons for speaking up. That she had concerns for women-only spaces,

like prisons and domestic violence shelters. That she worried about children not old enough

to make life-altering medical decisions. That, as the author of a series frequently targeted by

book bans, she was alarmed by the way conversations and debates were being shut down.

Then, she shared a personal story, which she hadn’t revealed until this moment.

Not just that she had been abused by her ex-husband, but that separately,

she had also suffered a serious sexual assault. She wrote, I’ve been in the public eye now for

over 20 years, and have never talked publicly about being a domestic abuse and sexual assault

survivor. This isn’t because I’m ashamed those things happened to me, but because they’re traumatic

to revisit and remember. I’m mentioning these things now, not in an attempt to garner sympathy,

but out of solidarity with the huge numbers of women who have histories like mine,

who have been slurred as bigots for having concerns around single-sex spaces.

If you could come inside my head and understand what I feel when I read about a trans woman

dying at the hands of a violent man, you’d find solidarity and kinship. I have a visceral sense

of the terror in which those trans women will have spent their last seconds on earth, because I too

have known moments of blind fear when I realized that the only thing keeping me alive was the shaky

self-restraint of my attacker. I believe the majority of trans-identified people not only

pose zero threat to others, but are vulnerable for all the reasons I’ve outlined. Trans people need

and deserve protection. Like women, they’re most likely to be killed by sexual partners.

Trans women who work in the sex industry, particularly trans women of color, are at

particular risk. Like every other domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor I know,

I feel nothing but empathy and solidarity with trans women who’ve been abused by men.

So I want trans women to be safe. At the same time, I do not want to make natal girls and women

less safe. When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who

believes or feels he’s a woman, and as I’ve said, gender confirmation certificates may now be granted

without any need for surgery or hormones, then you open the door to any and all men

who wish to come inside. That is the simple truth.

Rowling ended her essay with the following.

I haven’t written this essay in the hope that anybody will get out a violin for me,

not even a teeny weeny one. I’m extraordinarily fortunate. I’m a survivor, certainly not a victim.

I’ve only mentioned my past because, like every other human being on this planet,

I have a complex backstory which shapes my fears, my interests, and my opinions.

I never forget that inner complexity when I’m creating a fictional character.

And I certainly never forget it when it comes to trans people.

All I’m asking, all I want, is for similar empathy, similar understanding, to be extended to the many

millions of women whose sole crime is wanting their concerns to be heard without receiving threats

and abuse. What in the living fuck did I read?

If her hope in writing that essay was to win over some of her critics,

in the days following its publication? But this is a matter of free speech, darling.

I suppose everyone’s also conveniently forgotten that I was poor.

There was plenty of evidence that it didn’t work.

Let the joyous news be spread, the wicked old witch at last is dead.

Many saw Rowling’s essay as her death knell and started sharing videos and memes.

Some saying that they were explaining J.K. Rowling’s essay so you don’t have to read it.

Others saying, ding dong, the witch is dead.

Seeing as J.K. Rowling is such a terrible person, I’m here with an official statement

from the government to say we no longer recognize her as author of the Harry Potter series.

From now on, we’re telling the future generations, look kid, we don’t know who wrote that.

Just popped out of thin air like the Bible.

J.K. Rowling uses the fact that misogyny is real, it does exist, to be the constant victim.

And in her warped, awful morality, she thinks being a victim entitles her to victimize

anyone that she wants to.

J.K. Rowling’s opinions about trans issues literally get trans people killed,

but stay comfortable, I guess.

A trend started on TikTok where users began burning their Harry Potter books.

So let me talk about the infamous book burning video for a second.

I am not just offended by what J.K. Rowling says,

I am fearful because of what she is promoting on her platform.

Or tearing them into pieces.

What am I doing, you might ask?

I’m making recycled paper out of this book that I used to love,

wrote by a transphobic author.

Campaigns were started to boycott her books and merchandise.

You need to stop buying Harry Potter books because a very homophobic,

transphobic and racist woman would be profiting off of them.

And others organized to get her books removed from schools.

Now, J.K. Rowling will not be the last author

that we need to vet and remove from our classrooms.

Our job as educators is to create safe and inclusive spaces for all our students.

We cannot do this if we have authors on our shelves that perpetuate hate and racism.

So vet your books and get rid of problematic authors.


After Rowling’s essay, Mugglenet called her comments harmful to trans people

and then, like other fan forums, they removed their photos of Rowling from the site.

Hardcore fans got their Harry Potter tattoos removed.

At least two British schools removed Rowling’s name from houses they had titled in her honor.

Players of Quidditch, the fictional sport she invented,

ultimately changed its name to dissociate themselves from her.

An I Love J.K. Rowling poster that was hanging in a Scottish railway station

was criticized as hate speech by some members of the public,

and then removed by transportation authorities.

But the backlash had far more impact on women who lack Rowling’s power and privilege.

Gillian Philip, a children’s book author, added the hashtag

I Stand With J.K. Rowling to her Twitter bio, igniting a wave of rape threats,

death threats, and a campaign for her to be dropped by her publisher.

And just 24 hours later, she received a call from HarperCollins and was fired on the spot.

Unlike Rowling, she still needed income and now works as a truck driver.

Rosa Friedman, a human rights lawyer and professor, came out publicly against self-ID laws

and received death and rape threats, along with calls for her to be fired,

and even urine poured on her office door.

Jo Phoenix, a criminology researcher who works with women prisoners,

spoke publicly in support of female-only prisons,

and was pushed out of her position at Open University after a petition was passed around

calling her fundamentally hostile to the rights of trans people.

Jenny Lindsay, a prominent Scottish poet who only spoke up to oppose calls for violence

directed at so-called TERFs, she became the object of such intense threats

that the police counseled her to avoid public events for her own safety.

And Kathleen Stock, the philosophy professor whose essay,

This Is Not a Drill, was shared by Rowling,

who was advocating for academic freedom to debate these questions,

even if her side turned out to be wrong, she became the object of fierce campus protests.

In 2021, a group of students formed to demand that Stock be fired.

This group started coming to campus with big signs, they were letting off flares,

they were taking photos for this website that they’d started called Kathleen Stock is a TERF,

or something like that.

The website’s actually called Anti-TERF Sussex,

and their mission statement reads in part,

The website’s actually called Anti-TERF Sussex,

and their mission statement reads in part,

We fucking had enough.

Our demand is simple.

Fire Kathleen Stock.

It’s just crazy.

They just don’t have a clue who I am.

And yet they were happy to stand there and try and get me out.

Stock, who is herself a lesbian,

rejects the accusations that she is anti-queer or anti-trans.

But the protesters continued their campaign.

They put up posters all over campus saying things like,

Kathleen Stock makes trans students unsafe.

They graffitied the walls of nearby subway tunnels and underpasses with the simple,

Stock out.

After that, I was advised to stay at home and teach from home.

Ultimately, after nearly two decades at the University of Sussex,

Stock felt forced to resign.

The UK’s Minister of Higher Education said,

It is absolutely appalling that the toxic environment at the University of Sussex

has made it untenable for Professor Kathleen Stock to continue in her position there.

The sustained campaign of harassment and intimidation she has faced

is deplorable, and the situation should never have got this far.

I mean, it’s an extension of the whole experience, which is that you

do feel alternating between feeling like you’re going crazy,

feeling anger, feeling total defeat,

and then also feeling all the feelings of shame and guilt that they want you to feel.

Because to just suddenly have all fingers pointing at you,

you feel you can’t help but take on the feelings that they want you to have for a bit.

You have to really defend yourself against it.

You have to remind yourself.

You have to keep going back to what you actually wrote.

And you almost expect there to be some terrible inflammatory language there,

or some terrible threat to somebody that somehow you didn’t notice that you’d written.

But then you remind yourself,

No, I just wrote this sort of relatively centrist, moderate, in the middle, compassionate thing.

So yeah, it’s really a psychological battle to stay strong

and not take on the projections that are coming at you in the moment.

That’s how it felt.

And I didn’t always succeed.

What do you say to the people who say,

That’s just accountability?

Look, I’ve heard this all the time.

We’re holding you accountable.

We’re holding you accountable.

Well, I would say this.

I’m a great believer in looking at not what people say, but what they do.

How are you behaving?

If you are threatening, if you are threatening to remove livelihoods,

if you are saying this person is cancelled, that is the language of a dictator.

I cancel you.

I obliterate you.

You are dead.

I mean, I’ve literally lost count of the number of times

I’ve seen the hashtag RIP JK Rowling floating around.

But this isn’t about me.

You know, clearly I’m pretty resilient.

I don’t call that being held accountable.

If you want to debate with me, I am absolutely open to that.

And I think I have proven that I’m very willing to engage on the ideas.

But I notice a remarkable disinclination to engage on the ideas.

The response is,

Well, we can’t listen to you.

You are evil.

You must not be listened to.

That to me is intellectually incredibly cowardly.

I don’t believe that any righteous movement behaves in such a way.

One of the reasons that many people are interested in what Rowling has done,

even if they’ve never read Harry Potter,

even if they don’t follow this debate between some feminists and some trans rights activists,

is because this experience she’s describing

feels like it’s become much more familiar over the past decade.

When it comes to controversial issues,

whether it’s abortion or racism, Brexit or Trump, vaccines or COVID school closures,

it’s becoming much more common,

not just for disagreement to be heated and fierce,

but for people to see anyone who doesn’t share their view as evil.

For many onlookers,

even ones who vehemently disagree with the questions and objections that J.K. Rowling is raising,

she is highlighting a breakdown in the fabric of a pluralistic society.

One of my very dearest friends is a committed and practicing Catholic,

and he’s also pro-life.

Now, I’m a feminist, I’m pro-choice.

I understand exactly what his arguments are.

His arguments are.

And I respect his argument.

And he is prepared to make his argument.

I don’t agree with his argument,

but he respects my argument.

And we are both able to find shades of grey within our beliefs.

I think that is healthy.

I think that is productive.

I am not going to cut that person out of my life

because we disagree on something,

albeit something that is very important to me.

We have lost that in this particular debate.

What do you say to the people who say that you,

maybe because of your experiences,

that you can’t see that you’ve actually become like the villains in your books,

that this fight you’ve jumped into is a betrayal of some kind?

I suppose the thing I would say,

above all, to those who seek to tell me that I don’t understand my own book,

I will say this.

Some of you have not understood the books.

The Death Eaters claimed we have been made to live in secret,

and now is our time.

And any who stand in our way must be destroyed.

If you disagree with us, you must die.

They demonised and dehumanised those who were not like them.

I am fighting what I see as a powerful, insidious, misogynistic movement

that I think has gained huge purchase in very influential areas of society.

I do not see this particular movement as either benign or powerless.

So I’m afraid I stand with the women who are fighting to be heard

against threat of loss of livelihood and threats to their personal safety.

But as passionately as Rowling feels,

and as much as the experience of speaking up has served to confirm her feelings,

there are many Harry Potter fans,

especially transgender fans,

who feel that the threats and harassment she’s received don’t speak for them,

and who bristle at the idea that their side is the side with power.

And some of these fans are still holding out hope that Rowling will change her mind.

What would you want to say to JK Rowling?

I just kind of hope she could try to see why so many trans people are angry and hurt by this.

I realize that that means asking for a second to, like,

leave her own position of feeling hurt and threatened.

But that’s what she says that she wants to do.

And to me, what doing that would look like would be

understanding why people who are sort of being constantly rejected

and humiliated by our families, by the government,

who are either losing our access to health care or being threatened with it,

who are kind of just, like, fighting for a basic ability to participate in society,

like, why we might feel hurt and betrayed by her sort of contributing to, like, fear about us.

That’s, I guess, what I would say.

More, next time.

You’ve been listening to The Witch Trials of JK Rowling,

produced by Andy Mills, Matthew Boll, and me, Megan Phelps-Roper,

and brought to you by The Free Press.

Our sincere thanks to you for listening, and we would love to listen to you, too.

If you have any questions or thoughts for us,

you can send us an email over at


this podcast is brought to you by The Free Press.

The Free Press is a new kind of media company trying to help restore trust in journalism

at a time when that trust is at a historic all-time low.

And we’re doing that by printing stories, hosting debates,

and publishing a wide range of opinion pieces,

all in an effort to break out of echo chambers and fight against confirmation bias,

and see the world as the complicated and sometimes wonderful mess that it really is.

If that sounds like something you value, become a subscriber today at

Thank you.