Huberman Lab - The Science of Hearing, Balance & Accelerated Learning

Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,

where we discuss science

and science-based tools for everyday life.

I’m Andrew Huberman,

and I’m a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology

at Stanford School of Medicine.

Today, we’re going to talk all about hearing and balance

and how you can use your ability to hear specific things

and your balance system in order to learn anything faster.

The auditory system, meaning the hearing system

and your balance system,

which is called the vestibular system,

interact with all the other systems of the brain and body

and used properly,

can allow you to learn information more quickly,

remember that information longer and with more ease,

and you can also improve the way you can hear.

You can improve your balance.

We’re going to talk about tools for all of that.

This is one area of science

where we understand a lot about the cells

and the mechanisms in the ear and in the brain and so forth.

So we’re going to talk about that a little bit,

and then we’re going to get directly into protocols,

meaning tools.

We’re also going to talk about ways

in which the auditory and balance systems suffer.

We’re going to talk about tinnitus,

which is this ringing of the ears

that unfortunately for people that suffer from it,

they really suffer.

It’s very intrusive for them.

We’re going to talk about some treatments

that can work in some circumstances,

and some of the more recent emerging treatments

that I think many people aren’t aware of.

We’re also going to talk about this,

what seems like kind of a weird fact,

which is that 70% of people, all people,

make what are called autoacoustic emissions.

Their ears actually make noises.

Chances are your ears are making noises right now,

but you can’t perceive them,

and yet those can have an influence on other people

and animals in your environment.

It’s a fascinating aspect to your biology.

You’re going to learn a lot about how your biology

and brain and ears and the so-called inner ear

that’s associated with balance.

You’re going to learn a lot about how all those work.

You’re going to learn a lot of neuroscience.

I’ll even tell you what type of music to listen to,

and if you listen to me,

you can leverage that in order to learn faster.

Before we begin talking about the science

of hearing and balance and tools that leverage

hearing and balance for learning faster,

I want to provide some information

about another way to learn much faster.

There’s a paper that was published recently.

This is a paper that was published in Cell Reports,

an excellent journal.

It’s a peer-reviewed paper from a really excellent group

looking at skill learning.

Now, previously, I’ve talked about how

in the attempt to learn skills,

the vital thing to do is to get lots of repetitions.

You’ve heard of the 10,000 hours thing.

You’ve heard of lots of different strategies

for learning faster, 80-20 rule and all that.

The bottom line is you need to generate many,

many repetitions of something that you’re trying to learn,

and the errors that you generate

are also very important for learning.

It also turns out that taking rest

within the learning episode is very important.

I want to be really clear what I’m referring to here.

In earlier episodes, I’ve discussed how

when you’re trying to learn something, it’s beneficial,

it’s been shown in scientific studies

that if you take a 20-minute shallow nap

or you simply do nothing after a period of learning,

that it enhances the rates of learning

and the depth of learning,

your ability to learn and remember that information.

What I’m about to describe are new data

that say that you actually should be injecting rest

within the learning episode.

I’m not talking about going to sleep while learning.

This is the way that the study was done.

The study involved having people learn sequences of numbers

or keys on a piano.

So let’s use the keys on a piano example.

I’m not a musician, but I think I’ll get this correct.

They asked people to practice a sequence of keys, G, D, F, E,

G, G, D, F, E, G, G, D, F, E, G.

And they would practice that either continually

for a given amount of time

or they would just do that for 10 seconds.

They would play G, D, F, E, G, G, D, F, E, G,

G, D, F, E, G, G, D, F, E, G for 10 seconds.

And then they would take a 10-second pause, a rest.

They would just take a space or a period of time

where they do nothing for 10 seconds.

Then they would go back to G, D, F, E, G, G, D, F, E, G.

So the two conditions essentially

were to have people practice continually,

lots of repetitions,

or to inject or insert these periods

of 10-seconds idle time

where they’re not doing anything.

They’re not looking at their phone.

They’re not focusing on anything.

They’re just letting their mind drift

wherever it wants to go.

And they are not touching the keys on the keyboard.

What they found was that the rates of learning,

the skill acquisition and the retention of the skills

was significantly faster

when they injected these short periods of rest,

these 10-second rest periods.

The rates of learning were,

when I say significantly faster, were much, much faster.

I’ll reveal what that was in just a moment.

But you might ask, why would this work?

Why would it be that injecting these 10-second rest periods

would enhance rates of learning?

What they called them was micro-offline gains

because they’re sort of taking their brain offline

from the learning task for a moment.

Well, it turns out the brain isn’t going offline at all.

You’ve probably heard of the hippocampus,

the area of the brain involved in memory,

and the neocortex, the area of the brain

that’s involved in processing sensory information.

Well, it turns out that during these brief periods of rest,

these 10-second rest periods,

the hippocampus and the cortex are active in ways

such that you get a 20 times repeat of the GD-FEG.

It’s a temporal compression, as they say.

So basically the rehearsal continues while you rest,

but at 20 times the speed.

So if you were normally getting just,

let’s just say five repetitions of GD-FEG,

GD-FEG, GD-FEG per 10 seconds,

now you multiply that times 20.

In the rest periods, you’ve practiced it a hundred times.

Your brain has practiced it.

We know this because they were doing brain imaging,

functional imaging of these people with brain scanners

while they were doing this.

This is an absolutely staggering effect.

And it’s one that, believe it or not,

has been hypothesized or thought to exist

for a very long time.

This effect is called the spacing effect,

and it was actually first proposed by Ebbington in 1885.

And since then, it’s been demonstrated

for a huge number of different,

what they call domains, in the cognitive domain,

so for learning languages, in the physical domain,

so for learning skills that involve a motor sequence.

It’s been demonstrated for a huge number

of different categories of learning.

If you want to learn all about the spacing effect

and the categories of learning that it can impact,

there’s a wonderful review article.

I’ll provide a link to it.

The title of the review article is

Parallels Between Spacing Effects

During Behavioral and Cellular Learning.

What that review really does is it ties

the behavioral learning and the improvement of skill

to the underlying changes in neurons

that can explain that learning.

I should mention that the paper that I’m referring to,

the more recent paper that injects

these 10-second little micro-offline gains rest periods,

is the work of the laboratory of Leonard Cohen,

not the musician Leonard Cohen.

He passed away.

He was not a neuroscientist,

a wonderful poet and musician, but not a neuroscientist.

Again, the paper was published in Cell Reports,

and we will provide a link to the full paper as well.

So the takeaway is if you’re trying to learn something,

you need to get those reps in,

but one way that you can get 20 times

the number of reps in is by injecting

these little 10-second periods of doing nothing.

Again, during those rest periods,

you really don’t want to attend to anything else

as much as possible.

You could close your eyes if you want,

or you can just simply wait

and then get right back into generating repetitions.

I find these papers that Cell Reports

and other journals have been publishing recently

to be fascinating because they’re really helping us

understand what are the best protocols

for learning anything,

and they really leverage the fact

that the brain is willing to generate repetitions for us

provided that we give it the rest that it needs.

So inject rest throughout the learning period,

and if you can, based on the scientific data,

you would also want to take a 20-minute nap

or a 20-minute decompressed period

where you’re not doing anything after a period of learning.

I think those could both synergize

in order to enhance learning even further,

although that hasn’t been looked at yet.

Before we begin talking about hearing and balance,

I just want to mention that this podcast is separate

from my teaching and research roles at Stanford.

It is, however, part of my desire and effort

to bring zero cost to consumer information about science

and science-related tools to the general public.

In keeping with that theme,

I want to thank the sponsors of today’s podcast

and make it clear that we only work with sponsors

whose products we absolutely love

and that we think you will benefit from as well.

Our first sponsor is Athletic Greens.

Athletic Greens is an all-in-one

vitamin mineral probiotic drink.

I’ve been taking Athletic Greens since 2012,

so I’m delighted that they’re sponsoring the podcast.

The reason I started taking Athletic Greens

and the reason I still take Athletic Greens

once or twice a day is that it helps me cover

all of my basic nutritional needs.

It makes up for any deficiencies that I might have.

In addition, it has probiotics

which are vital for microbiome health.

I’ve done a couple of episodes now

on the so-called gut microbiome

and the ways in which the microbiome interacts

with your immune system, with your brain to regulate mood,

and essentially with every biological system

relevant to health throughout your brain and body.

With Athletic Greens, I get the vitamins I need,

the minerals I need, and the probiotics

to support my microbiome.

If you’d like to try Athletic Greens,

you can go to slash Huberman

and claim a special offer.

They’ll give you five free travel packs

plus a year supply of vitamin D3K2.

There are a ton of data now showing that vitamin D3

is essential for various aspects

of our brain and body health.

Even if we’re getting a lot of sunshine,

many of us are still deficient in vitamin D3

and K2 is also important because it regulates things

like cardiovascular function, calcium in the body,

and so on.

Again, go to slash Huberman

to claim the special offer of the five free travel packs

and the year supply of vitamin D3K2.

Today’s episode is also brought to us by Element.

Element is an electrolyte drink that has everything you need

and nothing you don’t.

That means the exact ratios of electrolytes are in Element

and those are sodium, magnesium, and potassium,

but it has no sugar.

I’ve talked many times before on this podcast

about the key role of hydration and electrolytes

for nerve cell function, neuron function,

as well as the function of all the cells

and all the tissues and organ systems of the body.

If we have sodium, magnesium, and potassium

present in the proper ratios,

all of those cells function properly

and all our bodily systems can be optimized.

If the electrolytes are not present and if hydration is low,

we simply can’t think as well as we would otherwise,

our mood is off, hormone systems go off,

our ability to get into physical action,

to engage in endurance and strength

and all sorts of other things is diminished.

So with Element, you can make sure

that you’re staying on top of your hydration

and that you’re getting the proper ratios of electrolytes.

If you’d like to try Element, you can go to drinkelement,

that’s slash Huberman,

and you’ll get a free Element sample pack

with your purchase, they’re all delicious.

So again, if you want to try Element,

you can go to slash Huberman.

Today’s episode is also brought to us by Thesis.

Thesis makes what are called nootropics,

which means smart drugs.

Now, to be honest, I am not a fan of the term nootropics,

I don’t believe in smart drugs in the sense that

I don’t believe that there’s any one substance

or collection of substances that can make us smarter.

I do believe based on science, however,

that there are particular neural circuits

and brain functions that allow us to be more focused,

more alert, access creativity, be more motivated, et cetera.

That’s just the way that the brain works,

different neural circuits for different brain states.

Thesis understands this.

And as far as I know, they’re the first nootropics company

to create targeted nootropics for specific outcomes.

I’ve been using Thesis for more than six months now,

and I can confidently say that their nootropics

have been a total game changer.

My go-to formula is the clarity formula,

or sometimes I’ll use their energy formula before training.

To get your own personalized nootropic starter kit,

go online to slash Huberman,

take a three-minute quiz,

and Thesis will send you four different formulas

to try in your first month.

That’s slash Huberman,

and use the code Huberman at checkout

for 10% off your first order.

I’m pleased to announce that the Huberman Lab Podcast

is now partnered with Momentus Supplements.

We partnered with Momentus for several important reasons.

First of all, they ship internationally,

because we know that many of you are located

outside of the United States.

Second of all, and perhaps most important,

the quality of their supplements is second to none,

both in terms of purity and precision

of the amounts of the ingredients.

Third, we’ve really emphasized supplements

that are single ingredient supplements,

and that are supplied in dosages

that allow you to build a supplementation protocol

that’s optimized for cost,

that’s optimized for effectiveness,

and that you can add things and remove things

from your protocol in a way

that’s really systematic and scientific.

If you’d like to see the supplements

that we partner with Momentus on,

you can go to slash Huberman.

There you’ll see those supplements,

and just keep in mind that we are constantly expanding

the library of supplements available through Momentus

on a regular basis.

Again, that’s slash Huberman.

Can you hear me?

Can you hear me?

Okay, well, if you can hear me, that’s amazing,

because what it means is that my voice

is causing little tiny changes in the airwaves,

wherever you happen to be,

and that your ears and whatever’s contained in those ears

and in your brain can take those sound waves

and make sense of them.

And that is an absolutely fantastic

and staggering feat of biology,

and yet we understand a lot about how that process works.

So I’m going to teach it to you now in simple terms

over the next few minutes.

So what we call ears have a technical name.

That technical name is auricles,

but more often they’re called pinna,

the pinnas, P-I-N-N-A, pinna.

And the pinnas of your ears,

this outer part that is made of cartilage and stuff,

is arranged such that it can capture sound

in the best way for your head size.

We’re going to talk about ear size also,

because it turns out that your ears change size

across the lifespan, and that how big your ears are,

or rather how fast your ears are changing size,

is a pretty good indication of how fast you’re aging.

So we’ll get to that in a few minutes,

but I want to talk about these things that we call ears

and some of the stuff contained within them

that allow us to hear.

So the shape of these ears that we have

is such that it amplifies high-frequency sounds.

High-frequency sounds, as the name suggests,

are the squeakier stuff, right?

So low-frequency sound.

Costello snoring in the background,

that’s a low-frequency sound.

Or high-frequency sound, okay?

So we have low-frequency sounds and high-frequency sounds

and everything in between.

Now, those sound waves get captured by our ears,

and those sound waves, for those of you that don’t

maybe fully conceptualize sound waves,

are literally just fluctuations or shifts

in the way that air is moving

toward your ear and through space.

In the same way that water can have waves,

air can have waves, okay?

So it’s reverberation of air.

Those come in through your ears

and you have what’s called your eardrum.

And on the inside of your eardrum,

there’s a little bony thing that’s shaped

like a little hammer.

So attached to that eardrum,

which can move back and forth like a drum,

it’s like a little membrane,

you’ve got this hammer attached to it.

And that hammer has three parts.

For those of you that want to know,

those three parts are called the malleus,

incus, and stapes.

But basically, you can just think about it as a hammer.

So you’ve got this eardrum and then a hammer,

and then that hammer has to hammer on something.

And what it does is it hammers

on a little coiled piece of tissue

that we call the cochlea, sometimes called the cochlea,

depending on where somebody lives in the country.

So typically in the Midwest, on the East Coast,

they call them cochlea,

and on the West Coast, we call them cochlea, same thing.

So this snail-shaped structure in your inner ear

is where sound gets converted into electrical signals

that the brain can understand.

But I want to just bring your attention

to that little hammer,

because that little hammer is really, really cool.

What it means is that sound waves come in through your ears,

that’s what’s happening right now,

that eardrum that you have, it’s like the top of a drum,

it’s like a membrane, or it can move back and forth,

it’s not super rigid, and it moves that little hammer,

and then the hammer goes,

dun-dun-dun-dun-dun, and hits this coil-shaped thing

that we’re calling the cochlea, okay?

Now, the cochlea, at one end,

is more rigid than the other.

So one part can move really easily,

and the other part doesn’t move very easily.

And that turns out to be very important

for decoding or separating sounds that are low-frequency,

like Costello’s snoring,

and sounds that are of high-frequency,

like a shriek or a shrill.

And that’s because within that little coiled thing

we call the cochlea,

you have all these tiny little, what are called hair cells.

Now, they look like hairs,

but they’re not at all related to the hairs on your head

or elsewhere on your body.

They’re just shaped like hair, so we call them hair cells.

Those hair cells, if they move,

send signals into the brain

that a particular sound is in our environment.

And if those hair cells don’t move,

it means that particular sound is not in our environment.


So just to give you the mental picture of this,

sound waves are coming in

because there’s stuff out there making noises,

like my voice.

It’s changing the patterns of air around you

in very, very subtle ways.

That information is getting funneled into your ears

because your pinnas are shaped in a particular way.

The eardrum then moves this little hammer

and the hammer bangs on this little snail-shaped thing.

And because that snail-shaped thing at one end

is very rigid, it doesn’t want to move,

and at the other end, it’s very flexible,

it can separate out high-frequency and low-frequency sounds.

And the fact that this thing in your inner ear

that we call the cochlea is coiled

is actually really important to understand

because along its length,

it varies in how rigid or flexible it is.

I already mentioned that before.

And at the base, it’s very rigid.

And that’s where the hair cells, if they move,

will make high-frequency sounds.

And at the top, what’s called the apex,

it’s very flexible and it’s more like a bass drum.

So basically what happens is sound waves come into your ears

and then at one end of this thing that we call the cochlea,

at the top, it’s essentially encoding

or only responding to sounds like doom, doom, doom, doom,

whereas at the bottom,

it responds to high-frequency sounds like a cymbal,

tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, tss, okay?

And everywhere in between,

we have other frequencies, medium frequencies.

Now, this should stagger your mind.

If it doesn’t already, it should

because what this means

is that everything that’s happening around us,

whether or not it’s music or voices or crying or screaming

or screaming of delight from small children

who are excited because they’re playing

or because they get cake,

all of that is being broken down into its component parts.

And then your brain is making sense of what it means.

These things that I’ve been talking about,

like the pinna of your ears

and this little hammer and the cochlea,

that’s all purely mechanical.

It has no mind of its own.

It’s just breaking things down into high frequencies,

medium frequencies, and low frequencies.

And if you don’t understand sound frequency,

it’s really simple to understand.

Just imagine ripples on a pond,

and if those ripples are very close together,

that’s high frequency.

They occur at high frequency.

If those ripples are further apart, it’s low frequency.

And obviously, medium frequency is in between.

So just like you can have waves in water,

you can have waves in air.

So that’s really how it works.

Now, we are all familiar with light

and how if you take a prism and put it in front of light,

it will split that light into its different wavelengths,

its different colors, red, green, blue, et cetera, right?

So like the Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon album,

I think has a prism,

and it’s converting white light into all the colors,

all the wavelengths that are contained in white light.

Your cochlea essentially acts as a prism.

It takes all the sound in your environment

and it splits up those sounds into different frequencies.

So you can think of the cochlea of your ear

sort of like a prism,

and then the brain takes that information

and puts it back together and makes sense of it.

So those hair cells in each of your two cochlea,

because you have two ears, you also have two cochlea,

send little wires, what we call axons,

that convey their patterns of activity into the brain.

And there are a number of different stations

within the brain that information arrives at

before it gets up to the parts of your brain

where you are consciously aware.

And because some of you have asked for more names

and nomenclature, I’ll give that to you.

If you don’t want a lot of detailed names,

you can just ignore what I’m about to say,

but basically the cochlea send information

to what’s called the spiral ganglion.

The spiral ganglion, a ganglion, by the way,

if you’re going to learn any neuroscience,

just know that anytime you hear ganglion,

a ganglion is just a clump.

So it means a bunch of neurons.

So a clump of cells.

So the spiral ganglion is a bunch of neurons

that the information then goes off

to what are called the cochlear nuclei in the brainstem.

Brainstem is kind of down near your neck,

then up to a structure that has a really cool name

called the superior olive,

because you have one on each side of your brain.

And if I were to bring you to my lab

and show you the superior olives in your brain

or anyone else’s brain, they look like little olives.

They even have a little divot in them

that to me looks like a pimiento,

but they just call them the superior olive.

And then the neurons in the superior olive,

then they send information up

to what’s called the inferior colliculus,

only called inferior because it sits below

a structure called the superior colliculus.

And then the information goes up

to what’s called the medial geniculate nucleus,

and then up to your neocortex,

where you make sense of it all.

Now, you don’t have to remember all that,

but you should know that there are a lot of stations

in which auditory information is processed

before it gets up to our conscious detection.

And there is a good reason for that,

which is that more important than knowing

what you’re hearing,

you need to know where it’s coming from.

It’s vital to our survival that if something, for instance,

is falling toward us,

that we know if it’s coming to our right side,

if it’s going to hit us from behind.

We have to know, for instance,

if a car is coming at us from our left or from our right.

And our visual system can help with that.

But our auditory and our visual system collaborate

to help us find and locate the position of things in space.

That should come as no surprise.

If you hear somebody talking off to your right,

you tend to turn to your right, not to your left.

If you see somebody’s mouth moving in front of you,

you tend to assume that the sound

is going to come from right in front of you.

Disruptions in this auditory hearing and visual matching

are actually the basis of what’s called

the ventriloquism effect,

which we’ll talk about in a few minutes in more depth.

But the ventriloquism effect can basically be described

in simple terms as when you essentially think

that a sound is coming from a location

that it’s not actually coming from.

We’ll talk about that in a moment,

but what I’d like you to realize

is that one of these stations deep in your brainstem

is responsible for helping you identify

where sounds are coming from

through a process that’s called interaural time differences.

And that sounds fancy,

but really the way you know where things are coming from,

what direction a car or a bus or a person is coming from

is because the sound lands in one ear before the other.

And you have stations in your brain,

meaning you have neurons in your brain

that calculate the difference in time of arrival

for those sound waves in your right versus your left ear.

And if they arrive at the same time,

you assume that thing is making noise

right in front of you.

If it’s off to your right,

you assume it’s over on your right.

And if the sound arrives first to your left ear,

you assume quite correctly

that the thing is coming toward your left ear.

So it’s a very simple and kind of mechanical system

at the level of sound localization.

But what about up and down?

If you think about it,

a sound coming from above is going to land

on your right ear and your left ear at the same time.

A sound from below is going to land on your right ear

and your left ear at the same time.

So the way that we know where things are

in terms of what’s called elevation,

where they are in the up and down plane

is by the frequencies.

The shape of your ears actually modifies the sound

depending on whether or not it’s coming straight at you

from the floor or from high above.

And so already at the level of your ears,

you are taking information about the outside world

and determining where that information is coming from.

Now, this all happens very, very fast in the subconscious,

but now you know why

if people really want to hear something,

they make a cup around their ear.

They essentially make their ear

into more of a fennec fox type ear.

If you’ve ever seen those cute little fennec fox things,

they have these big spiky ears.

They kind of look like a French bulldog,

although they’re kind of the fox version

of the French bulldog.

These big, tall ears,

and they have excellent sound localization.

And so when people lean in with their hand like this,

if you’re listening to this,

I’m just cupping my hand at my ear.

I’m giving myself a bigger pinna.

Oh yeah, and if I do it on the left side, I do this side.

And if I really want to hear something,

I do it on both sides, okay?

So this isn’t just gesturing.

This actually serves a mechanical role.

And actually, if you want to hear

where things are coming from

with a much greater degree of accuracy,

this can actually help

because you’re capturing sound waves

and funneling them better.

It’s really remarkable, this whole system.

So you’ve got these two ears,

and because of the differences in the timing

of when things arrive in those two ears,

as well as these differences in the frequencies

that certain things sound,

or I should say the differences in the frequencies

that arrive at your ears,

depending on whether or not the thing is above you

or right in front of you or below you,

you’re able to make out

where things are in space pretty well.

So now you’re probably starting to realize

that these two things on the side of our head

that we call ears are there for a lot more

than hanging earrings on or for other aesthetic purposes

or for putting sunglasses on top of.

They are very powerful devices

for allowing us to capture sound waves from our environment.

Now I have a question for you,

which is, can you move your ears?

Turns out that unlike other animals,

humans are not terrifically good at moving their ears.

Other animals can move their ears even independently.

So Costello is pretty good at raising his ears,

the two of them together.

He can’t really move his ears separately.

Some dogs can do that really well.

In fact, sight hounds and some scent hounds

do that exquisitely well.

Some animals like deer and other animals

that really have a very acute hearing

will put one ear down to a very particular angle

and will tilt the other one

and they will actually capture information

about two distant sound-making organisms.

Those could be hunters coming after them

or other animals coming after them.

They are very good at doing this.

We’re not so good at it,

but about 60% of people, it’s thought,

can move their ears consciously

without having to touch their ears.

So can you do that?

Maybe you should try it.

Ask someone to look at you

and see whether or not you can do it.

The typical distances that people can move it

is usually no more than two or three millimeters.

But can you flap your pinna

with just using mental control?

If you can, or if you can’t,

try looking all the way to your right

or all the way to your left.

Obviously, if you’re driving a car

or doing something or exercising,

don’t put yourself in danger right now.

But if you move your eyes all the way to your left,

which I’m doing now,

or all the way to my right,

you might feel a little bit of a contraction of the muscles

that control ear movement, all right?

Now, I want to ask you this.

Can you raise one eyebrow?

I’m not very good at it.

I can do a little bit,

but it’s mostly by cramping down my face on one side,

and I certainly can’t raise my right eyebrow.

I can only do my left eyebrow.

Trying to talk while I’m doing this,

so this is why it looks strange.

People who can raise one eyebrow very easily

almost always can move their ears

without having to touch them.

It’s controlled by the same motor pathway.

And there does seem to be a small

but statistically significant sex difference

in the ability to move one’s ears.

Typically, men can do this more than women can,

although plenty of women can move their ears as well.

Now, if you think that is all a little strange

or off topic, it’s not,

because what we’re really talking about here

is a system of the brain,

but also of the body, of the musculature

for localizing things in space.

And so you might find it interesting to note

that one of the things that we share very closely

with other primates, with non-human primates,

like macaque monkeys and chimpanzees,

if you look at their ears,

their ears are remarkably similar to our ears,

or rather our ears are remarkably similar to their ears.

The eyes of certain monkeys, like macaque monkeys,

are remarkably similar to human eyes.

This is one of the reasons why

if you look at a baby macaque monkey,

it has this unbelievably human element to it.

But the ears of these primates is very similar to our ears,

our ears similar to their ears.

If you’re interested in ear movements

and what they could mean,

and some of the things that ear movements correlate with

in other aspects of our biology,

there’s a nice paper, actually, a scientific paper.

The author’s last name is Code, C-O-D-E.

It was published in 1995.

I’ll give a reference to that.

It’s a review article that discusses

some of the sex differences in ear movement control,

as well as the relationship

between ear movements and eye movements.

And it’s a pretty accessible paper.

It’s one that I think any of you

who are interested in this topic could parse fairly easily.

And there’s some very interesting underlying biology

and some theories as to why humans

would have this so-called vestigial

or ancient carryover of a system for moving our ears.

Now, if ear movement seems strange,

next I want to talk about a different feature

of your hearing and ears that’s even stranger,

but that has some really interesting implications

for your biology.

And I’m guessing that you’ve not heard of this.

What I’m about to describe are called

autoacoustic emissions.

And autoacoustic emissions, as the name suggests,

are sounds that your ears make.

Believe it or not, 70% of people make noises

with their ears, but they don’t actually detect them.

Like I said, you’ve never heard of this, okay?

That’s not what I mean.

But what I do mean is that 70% of people’s ears

are making noise that’s cast out of the ear.

And these autoacoustic emissions

actually can be detected by microphones.

Sometimes they can be detected by other people in the room

if they have very good hearing.

Now, it turns out that women,

or I should be technical here,

females who report themselves as heterosexual

have a higher frequency, not frequency of sound,

but a higher frequency of autoacoustic emissions

than do men who report themselves as heterosexual.

Women who report themselves as homosexual or bisexual

make fewer autoacoustic emissions than heterosexual women.

These are data that come from Dennis McFadden’s lab

at the University of Texas, Austin.

He actually discovered these,

what are called sexual dimorphisms

and differences based on sexual orientation

without looking for them.

He was studying hearing.

He’s a auditory scientist

and people were coming into his laboratory

and they were detecting these autoacoustic emissions

and they started to notice the group differences

in autoacoustic emissions.

So they started asking people about their sex

and about their sexual orientation.

And these differences fell out of the data, as we say.

And it’s interesting because autoacoustic emissions

are not something that we associate with sex

or sexual dimorphism,

but what these data really underscore is, first of all,

a lot of us are making noises with our ears,

some of us more than others,

and that exposure to certain combinations

of hormones during development

are very likely shaping the way that our hearing apparati,

meaning the cochlea and the pinna and all sorts of things,

how those develop and how those function

throughout the lifespan.

We did do an episode on hormones and sexual development,

which gets much deeper into the other effects

that hormones have on the developing brain and body.

If you want to check out that episode,

we will put a link to it in the captions.

So now I want to shift to talking about

ways to leverage your hearing system, your auditory system,

so that you can learn anything,

not just auditory information, but anything faster.

I get a lot of questions about so-called binaural beats.

Binaural beats, as their name suggests,

involve playing one frequency of sound to one ear

and a different frequency of sound to the other ear.

So it might be,

dun, dun, dun, dun, to your right ear,

and it might be,

dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun, to the left ear.

And the idea is that

the brain will take those two frequencies of sound,

and because the pathways that bring information

from the ears into the brain eventually cross over,

they actually share that information

with both sides of the brain,

that the brain will average that information

and come up with a sort of intermediate frequency.

And the rationale is that those intermediate frequencies

place the brain into a state that is better for learning.

And when I say better for learning,

I want to be precise about what I mean.

That could mean more focus for encoding

or bringing the information in.

As you may have heard me say before,

we have to be alert and focused in order to learn.

There is no passive learning

unless we’re little tiny infants.

So can binaural beats make us more focused?

Can binaural beats allow us to relax more if we’re anxious?

I know some people,

they go to the dentist

and the dentist offers binaural beats

as they drill into your teeth

and give root canals and things of that sort,

probably causing some anxiety

just describing those things right now.

But those are available in several dentists,

many dental practices.

Their binaural beats have been thought

to increase creativity,

or at least have been proposed to increase creativity.

So what are the scientific data say about binaural beats?

There are a number of different apps out there

that offer binaural beats.

There are a number of different programs.

I think you can also even just find these

on YouTube and on the internet.

But typically it’s an app

and you’ll program in a particular outcome that you want,

more focused, more creative,

fall asleep, less anxious, et cetera.

So what are the scientific data say?

So believe it or not,

the science on binaural beats is actually quite extensive

and very precise.

So sound waves are measured typically in hertz

or kilohertz.

I know many of you aren’t familiar

with thinking about things in hertz or kilohertz.

But again, just remember those waves on a pond,

those ripples on a pond.

If they’re close together,

then they are of high frequency.

And if they’re far apart, then they are low frequency.

So when you hear more hertz,

what you’re essentially hearing is higher frequency, right?

And so if it’s many more kilohertz,

then it’s much higher frequency

than if it’s fewer hertz or kilohertz.

And so you may have heard of these things as delta waves

or theta waves or alpha waves or beta waves, et cetera.

Delta waves would be big, slow waves, so low frequency.

And indeed, there’s quality evidence

from peer-reviewed studies

that are not sponsored by companies

that make binaural beat apps

that tell us that delta waves like one to four hertz,

so very low frequency sounds,

think Costello’s snoring,

can help in the transition to sleep and for staying asleep.

And that theta rhythms,

which are more like four to eight hertz,

can bring the brain into a state of subtle sleep

or meditation.

So deeply relaxed, but not fully asleep.

And then you can sort of ascend the staircase

of findings here, so to speak,

and you’ll find evidence that alpha waves,

eight to 13 hertz,

can increase alertness to a moderate level.

That’s a great state for the brain to be in

for recall of existing information, okay?

And that beta waves, 15 to 20 hertz,

are great for bringing the brain into focus states

for sustained thought or for incorporating new information,

and especially gamma waves, the highest frequency,

the most frequent ripples of sound, so to speak,

32 to 100 hertz for learning and problem solving.

Now, all of this matches, or I should say,

maps onto what I’ve said before

about learning really nicely,

which is that you need to be in a highly alert state

in order to bring new information in,

in order to access a state of mind

in which you can tell your brain,

or the brain is telling itself,

okay, I need to learn this.

This is why stress and unfortunate circumstances

are so memorable,

is because our brain gets into a really high alert system.

Here, we’re talking about the use of binaural beats

in order to increase our level of alertness

or our level of calmness.

Now, that’s important to underscore

because it’s not that there’s something

fundamentally important about the binaural beats.

They are yet another way of bringing the brain

into states of deep relaxation through low-frequency sound

or highly alert states for focused learning

with more high-frequency sound.

So they are effective,

and I’ll review a little bit of the data in detail.

They’re effective,

but it’s not that they’re uniquely special for learning.

It’s just that they can help some people

bring their brain into the state

that allows them to learn better.

So there are a lot of studies that allowed us to arrive,

or I should say allowed the field to arrive

on these parameters of slow low-frequency waves

are going to bring you into relaxed states,

high-frequency waves into more alert states.

There’s very good evidence for anxiety reduction

from the use of binaural beats.

And what’s interesting is the anxiety reduction

seems to be most effective

when the binaural beats are bringing the brain into delta,

so those slow big waves like sleep,

theta and alpha states.

And I’ll link to a couple of these studies,

although I will probably link more to the list

that really segregates them out one by one

so you can see them all next to one another.

There’s good evidence that binaural beats

can be used to treat pain, chronic pain.

There’s three studies in peer-reviewed journals,

which I took a look at,

and they seem to be of good quality,

not sponsored research, as we say,

not paid for by any specific company.

Binaural beats have been shown

to modestly improve cognition, attention,

working memory, and even creativity.

But the real boost from binaural beats

appears to be for anxiety reduction and pain reduction.

Some people might find these beneficial

for these oral surgeries, right?

Believe it or not,

there are people who would rather have

the entire root canal or cavity drilled without Novocaine,

and that’s because they sometimes have a syringe phobia

or something of that sort,

or they just don’t like being numb from the Novocaine,

or maybe there’s an underlying medical reason.

But I think most people don’t enjoy

getting their teeth drilled

even if they have Novocaine in there or a root canal.

And so it seems that binaural beats

can be effective in that environment,

and you don’t have to go into

that sort of extreme environment

to benefit from binaural beats.

Binaural beats are a either

relatively inexpensive thing to access.

Most of the apps are pretty inexpensive.

I don’t have a favorite binaural beats app

to recommend to you.

I confess I did use binaural beats a few years ago.

I shifted over to other, what I call NSDR,

non-sleep deep rest protocols in favor of those.

But many people like binaural beats

and say that they benefit from them,

especially while studying or learning.

I think part of the reason for that

relates to the ability to channel our focus

when we have some background noise.

And this is something I also get asked about a lot.

Is it better to listen to music

and have background noise when studying,

or is it better to have complete silence?

Well, there’s actually a quite good literature

on this as well,

but not so much as it relates to binaural beats,

but rather whether or not people are listening to music,

so-called white noise, brown noise,

believe it or not, there’s white noise

and there’s brown noise, there’s even pink noise,

and how that impacts brain states

that allow us to learn information better or not.

So now I’d like to talk about white noise.

And I want to be very clear that white noise

has been shown to really enhance brain states for learning

in certain individuals, in particular in adults,

but white noise actually can have a detrimental effect

on auditory learning

and maybe even the development of the auditory system

in very young children, in particular in infants.

So first I’d like to talk about the beneficial effects

of white noise on learning.

There are some really excellent studies on this.

The first one that I’d like to just highlight

is one that’s entitled

Low Intensity White Noise Improves Performance

in Auditory Working Memory Task, an fMRI study.

This is a study that explored

whether or not learning could be enhanced

by playing white noise in the background.

But the strength of the study is that they looked

at some of the underlying neural circuitry

and the activation of the neural circuitry in these people

as they did the learning task.

And what it essentially illustrates

is that white noise, provided that white noise

is of low enough intensity, meaning not super loud, right?

Not imperceptible, so not so quiet that you can’t hear it,

but not super loud either.

It actually could enhance learning to a significant degree.

And this has been shown now for a huge number

of different types of learning.

There’s a terrific article as well,

is in a somewhat obscure journal, at least obscure to me,

which is the effects of noise exposure

on cognitive performance and brain activity patterns.

That’s a study involving 54 subjects.

They basically were evaluated

for mental workload and attention

under different levels of noise exposure,

background noise, and different,

essentially loudness of noise.

And the reason I like this study

is that they looked at different levels of noise

and types of noise,

and they varied a number of different things

as opposed to just doing a kind of two condition,

either white noise or no white noise type thing.

And what they found, again,

is that provided the white noise is not extremely loud,

it could really enhance brain function

for sake of learning any number

of different kinds of information.

Now, that’s all great,

but it really doesn’t get

to the kind of deeper guts of mechanism.

And as a neuroscientist,

what I really want to see

is not just that something has an effect.

That’s always nice.

It’s always nice to see in a nice peer-reviewed study

without any kind of commercial biases

that there’s an effect, okay?

Binaural beats can enhance learning

or listening to white noise, not too loud,

can enhance learning.

But you really want to understand mechanism

because once you understand mechanism,

not only does it start to make sense,

but you can also imagine ways

in which you could develop better tools and protocols.

So I was very relieved to find,

or I should say excited to find this study published

in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

This is a 2014 paper.

White noise improves learning by modulating activity

in dopaminergic midbrain regions

and the right superior temporal sulcus, okay?

Now, I don’t expect you to know

what the right superior temporal sulcus is.

I don’t expect you to know

what the dopamine midbrain region is,

but if you’re like me,

you probably took highlighted notice

of the word dopaminergic.

Dopamine is a neuromodulator,

meaning it’s a chemical that’s released in our brain

and body, but mostly in our brain,

that modulates, meaning controls the likelihood

that certain brain areas will be active

and other brain areas won’t be active.

And dopamine is associated with motivation.

Dopamine is associated with craving.

Motivation is associated with all sorts of different things,

including movement.

But what this study so nicely shows

is that white noise can really enhance the activity

of neurons in what’s called the substantia nigra VTA.

The substantia nigra VTA is a very rich source of dopamine.

And that’s because it’s very chock-a-block full

of dopamine neurons.

It’s an area of the brain that is perhaps

the richest source of dopamine neurons.

And you actually can see this brain region

under the microscope, if you take a slice of brain

or you look at a brain without even staining it

for any proteins or dopamine or anything,

it’s two very dark regions at the kind of bottom

of the brain.

And the reason it’s called substantia nigra,

nigra meaning dark, is because the dopamine neurons

actually make something that makes those neurons dark.

And so you’ve got these two regions down there

that contain dopamine and can release dopamine

and essentially activate other brain regions

and activate our sense of motivation

and activate our sense of desire

to continue focusing and learning.

But you can’t just snap your fingers

and make them release dopamine.

You actually have to trigger dopamine release from them.

Now that trigger can be caused

by being very excited about something

or the fact that that thing gave you a lot of pleasure

in the past, or you’re highly motivated by fear or desire.

But what’s so interesting to me is that it appears

that white noise itself can raise

what we call the basal, the baseline levels of dopamine

that are being released from this area,

the substantia nigra.

So now we’re starting to get a more full picture

of how particular sounds in our environment

can increase learning.

And that’s in part, I believe,

through the release of dopamine from substantia nigra.

So I’m not trying to shift you away from binaural beats

if that’s your thing,

but it does appear that turning on white noise

at a low level, not too loud.

You may say, well, how loud?

And I’ll tell you in a moment,

but not too loud can allow you to learn better

because of the ways that it’s modulating

your brain chemistry.

So how loud or how soft should that white noise be

while you learn?

Well, in these studies,

it seemed that white noise that could be heard

by the person, so it wasn’t imperceptible to them,

so it was loud enough that they could hear,

but not so loud that they felt it was intrusive

or irritating to them, okay?

So that’s going to differ from person to person

because people have different levels

of auditory sensitivity.

It’s going to depend on age,

going to depend on a number of different factors.

So I can’t tell you, turn to level two

on your volume controller.

That’s just not going to work.

Also, I don’t know how far you are

from a given speaker in the room,

or if you got earphones in your head,

or you’ve got speakers in the room,

or if it’s coming out of your computer.

I don’t know those things.

So what you’re going to have to do

is adjust that white noise to a place

where it’s not interfering with your ability to focus,

but rather it’s enhancing your ability to focus.

I think a good rule of thumb is going to be

to put it probably in the lower third

of any kind of volume dial,

as opposed to in the upper third

where it would really be blasting.

And really blasting any noise, frankly, is not good,

but that’s especially not good,

meaning it’s especially bad if you have headphones in.

I do want to mention something about headphones

before I talk about white noise

in the developmental context

and why it can be dangerous there.

When you put headphones in your ears,

it has this incredible effect of making the sounds

like they come from inside your head,

not from out in the room.

And now that might seem like kind of a duh,

but that’s actually really amazing, right?

Your brain assumes that the sounds

are coming from inside your head

as opposed from the environment that you’re in

the moment you put headphones in.

So if you’re listening to an audio book

or maybe you’re listening to this podcast with headphones,

that’s very different

than when you’re listening to something out in the room

and there are other sounds, other sound waves,

especially if you use these noise cancellation headphones.

So if you’re going to use white noise

to enhance studying or learning of any kind,

or this also could be for skill learning,

motor skill learning while you’re exercising,

my suggestion would be that if you’re using headphones

to keep it quite low, right?

This is an effect on the midbrain dopamine neurons.

That’s a background effect

of raising the baseline of dopamine release.

The way that dopamine neurons fires, they’re always firing.

Yours are firing right now, so are mine.

When something exciting happens, they fire a lot.

And when something disappointing happens,

that firing, the release of dopamine

goes down below baseline.

What you’re talking about here

is raising your overall levels of attention and motivation,

which translate to better learning

by just tickling those neurons a little bit,

raising the baseline, firing, okay?

So this isn’t, you’re not turning up the white noise

to the point where you’re feeling amazing.

This isn’t like turning on your favorite song.

This is actually the opposite.

This is about getting that baseline up just a bit, okay?

So I recommend turning the volume up just a bit

so that you can focus entirely on the task

that you’re trying to do.

And of course, you’ve turned on white noise

so your attention might drift to that for a moment.

Is it too loud? Is it too soft?

If you can disappear into the work, so to speak,

if your attention can disappear into the work,

then that’s probably sufficiently quiet.

And for those of you that say,

well, I like really loud music,

and if I just blast the music,

then I forget about the music.

I don’t suggest blasting music.

And this is coming from somebody

who really likes loud music.

I grew up with kind of a loud, fast rules mentality.

And if you don’t know what loud, fast rules means,

then I can’t help you.

But there’s a time and a place perhaps

to listen to music loud, but especially with headphones,

you can trigger, excuse me, hearing loss quite rapidly.

And unfortunately, because these hair cells

that we talked about earlier,

our central nervous system neurons,

they do not regenerate, they do not come back.

Now, along the lines of hearing loss,

I should just say that the best way

to blow out your hearing for good,

to eliminate your hearing,

is to have very loud sounds superimposed

on a loud environment, okay?

So loud environments can cause hearing loss over time.

So if you work at a construction site clanging really loud,

or if you work the soundboard in a club or something,

you are headed towards hearing loss,

unless you protect your hearing

with earplugs and headphones.

Nowadays, some of the earplugs are very low profile,

meaning you can’t see them.

So that’s kind of nice.

So you’re not like the, like when I was younger,

you didn’t want to be the dork

to go to the concert with the earplugs,

but turns out those dorks were smarter than everybody else

because they’re not the ones who are craning their neck

to try and hear trivial things at the age of 30 or so

because they blew out their hearing.

So if you are working in a loud environment

or you expose yourselves to a loud environment,

you really want to avoid big inflections

in sound above that.

So loud environment plus fireworks,

loud environment plus gunshot,

loud environments plus very high-frequency intense sound,

that’s what we call the two-hit model.

When you, this is also true for concussion,

that you can take a kind of a stimulus

that normally would be below the threshold of injury.

You add another stimulus at the same time

that would be below the threshold of injury,

and then suddenly you killed the neurons.

So I don’t want to make people paranoid,

but you do want to protect your hearing.

It’s no fun to lose your hearing.

If you’re going to use headphones

and you feel like you want to crank it up all the way,

just remember that the more that you can get

out of a lower volume,

meaning the longer that you can go listening

to things at lower volume,

the longer you’ll be able to hear that music or that thing.

So again, I’m not the hearing cop, that’s not my job,

but as somebody who’s lost

some of his high-frequency hearing,

I can tell you it’s not a pleasure.

The old argument that it helps you not have to hear

or listen to people that you don’t want to listen to,

that doesn’t really work.

They just send you text messages instead.

So what about white noise and hearing loss in development?

You know, a lot of people with children

have these kind of noise machines,

like sound waves and things like that,

that help the kids sleep.

And look, I think kids getting good sleep

and parents getting good sleep is vital

to physical and mental health and family health.

So I certainly sympathize with those needs.

However, there are data that indicate

that white noise during development

can be detrimental to the auditory system.

I don’t want to frighten any parents.

If you played white noise to your kids,

this doesn’t mean that their auditory system

or their speech patterns are going to be disrupted

or that their interpretation of speech

is going to be disrupted forever.

But there are data published in the journal Science,

and Science being one of the three apex journals,

Science, Nature, Cell, the most stringent journals.

Data published in the journal Science some years ago,

actually by a scientist who I know quite well.

His name is Edward Chang.

He’s a medical doctor now.

He’s a neurosurgeon.

He’s actually the chair of neurosurgery at UCSF.

And he runs a laboratory where they study

auditory learning, neuroplasticity, et cetera.

He and his mentor at the time, Mike Merzenich,

published a paper showing that if young animals,

and this was in animal models,

were exposed to white noise.

So, the very type of noise that I’m saying

as a older person, and when I say older,

I mean somebody who’s in their late teens,

early twenties and older,

could benefit from listening to that

at a low level in the background for sake of learning.

Well, when they exposed very young animals

to this white noise, it actually disrupted the maps

of the auditory world within the brain.

Now, we haven’t talked about these maps yet,

but I want to take a moment and talk about them

and explain this effect and what it might mean for you

if you have kids or if you were exposed

to a lot of white noise early on.

So, auditory information goes up into our cortex,

into essentially the outside portion of our brain

that’s responsible for all of our higher level cognition,

our planning, our decision-making, et cetera, creativity.

And up there, we have what are called tonotopic maps.

What’s a tonotopic map?

Well, remember the cochlea, how it’s coiled,

and at one end it responds to high frequencies

and the other end it responds to low frequencies?

Sort of like a piano, the keys sound different

as you extend down and up the piano keys,

and it’s organized in a very systematic way, right?

It’s not all intermixed high frequencies

and low frequencies, it’s organized in a very systematic way

from one end to the other.

Your visual system is in what’s called a retinotopic map.

So, neighboring points in space off to my right,

like my two fingers off to my right,

are mapped to neighboring points in space in my brain.

And the space right in front of me

is mapped to a different location in my brain,

but it’s systematic, it’s regular, it’s not random,

it’s not salt and pepper.

It goes from high to low or from right to center to left.

In the auditory system,

we have what are called tonotopic maps

where frequency, high frequency to low frequency

and everything in between

is organized in a very systematic way.

Now, our experience of life from the time we’re a baby

until the time that we die is not systematic.

We don’t hear low frequencies at one part of the room

or at one part of the day

and high frequencies at another part of the room

and another part of the day, they’re all intermixed.

But if you remember, the cochlea separates them out

just like a prism of light separates out

the different wavelengths of light,

the cochlea separates out the different frequencies.

And the developing brain

takes those separated out frequencies

and learns this relationship between itself,

meaning the child and the outside world.

White noise essentially contains no tonotopic information.

The frequencies are all intermixed, it’s just noise.

Whereas when I speak, my voice has,

now I’m getting technical,

but it has what’s called a certain envelope,

meaning it has some low frequencies

and some slightly high frequencies.

Like I make my voice higher,

although I’m not very good at that,

my voice starts to crack and I can make my voice lower,

although not as low as Costello’s snore.

So it has an envelope, it has a container.

White noise has no container.

It’s like all the colors of the rainbow

spread out together, which is actually what you get

when you get white light.

White noise is analogous to white light.

So one of the reasons why hearing a lot of white noise

during development for long periods of time

can be detrimental to the development of the auditory system

is that these tonotopic maps don’t form normally.

At least they don’t in experimental animals.

Now, the reason I’m raising this

is that many people I know,

in particular friends who have small children,

they say, I want to use a white noise machine while I sleep.

But is it okay for my baby to use a white noise machine?

And I consulted with various people, scientists about this,

and they said, well, you know,

the baby is also hearing the parents’ voices

and is hearing music and is hearing the dog bark.

So it’s not the only thing they’re hearing.

However, every single person that I consulted with said,

but you know, there’s neuroplasticity during sleep.

That’s when the kid is sleeping.

And I don’t know that you’d want to expose a child

to white noise the entire night

because it might degrade that tonotopic map.

It might not destroy it, it might not eliminate it,

but it could make it a little less clear,

like sort of taking the keys on the piano

and taping a few of them together, right?

So you still got the highs and lows

in the appropriate order and everything in between,

but when you tape the keys together,

you don’t get the same fidelity.

You don’t get the same precision of the noise

that comes out of that piano.

So I don’t, again, I don’t want to scare anybody,

but I would say if you are in a position

to make the choice of either using white noise

or something similar,

pink noise is just a kind of variation.

It’s got a little bit more of a certain frequency,

just like pink light has a little bit more

of a certain wavelength than white light.

If you are in a position to make choices

about things to put in a young,

especially very young child’s sleeping environment,

white noise might be something to consider avoiding.

Again, I’m not telling you what to do,

but it’s something to perhaps consider avoiding.

I don’t think most pediatricians

are going to be aware of these data,

but if you talk to any auditory physiologist

or an audiologist or somebody

who studies auditory development,

I’m fairly certain that they would have opinions about that.

Now, whether or not their opinions agree with mine

and these folks that I consulted with or not

is a separate matter.

I don’t know because I don’t know them,

but it’s something that I felt was important enough

to cue you to,

especially since I’ve highlighted, excuse me,

the opposite effect is true in adulthood.

Once your auditory system has formed,

once it’s established these tonotopic maps,

then the presence of background white noise

should not be a problem at all.

In fact, it shouldn’t be a problem at all

because you’re also not attending to it.

The idea is that it’s playing at a low enough volume

that you kind of forget it in the background

and that it’s supporting learning

by bringing your brain into a heightened state

of alertness and especially this heightened state

of dopamine, dopaminergic activation of the brain,

which will make it easier to learn faster

and easier to learn the information.

So now I want to talk about auditory learning

and actually how you can get better

at learning information that you hear,

not just information that you see on a page

or motor skill learning.

There are a lot of reasons to want to do this.

A lot of classroom teaching,

whether or not it’s by Zoom or in person,

is auditory in nature.

Not everything is necessarily written down for us.

It’s also good to get better at listening, or so I’m told.

So there’s a phenomenon called the cocktail party effect.

Now, even if you’ve never been to a cocktail party,

you’ve experienced and participated

in what’s called the cocktail party effect.

The cocktail party effect is where you are

in an environment that’s rich with sound,

many sound waves coming from many different sources,

many different things.

So in a city, in a classroom,

in a car that contains people having various conversations,

you somehow need to be able to attend

to specific components of those sound waves,

meaning you need to hear certain people and not others.

The reason it’s called the cocktail party effect

is that you, meaning your brain,

are exquisitely good at creating a cone

of auditory attention, a narrow band of attention

with which you can extract the information you care about

and wipe away or erase all the rest.

Now, this takes work.

It takes attention.

One of the reasons why you might come home

from a loud gathering, maybe a stadium, a sports event,

or a cocktail party for that matter,

and feel just exhausted is because

if you are listening to conversations there

or trying to listen to those conversations

while watching the game and people moving past you

and hearing all this noise, clinking of glasses, et cetera,

it takes attentional effort

and the brain uses up a lot of energy just at rest,

but it uses up even more energy

when you are paying strong attention to something,

literally caloric energy,

burning up things like glucose, et cetera.

Even if you’re ketogenic, it’s burning up energy.

So the cocktail party effect has been studied extensively

in the field of neuroscience.

And we now know at a mechanistic level

how one accomplishes this feat

of attending to certain sounds,

despite the fact that we are being bombarded

with all sorts of other sounds.

So there are a couple of ways that we do this.

First of all, much as with our visual system,

we can expand or contract our visual field of view

so we can go from panoramic vision,

see the entire scene that we are in by dilating our gaze.

Talked a lot about this on this podcast and elsewhere.

We can, for instance, keep our head and eyes stationary

or mostly stationary.

You don’t have to be rigid about it.

And you can expand your field of view

so you can see the walls and ceiling and floor,

can see yourself in the environment.

That’s panoramic view.

It’s what you would accomplish without having to try at all

if you went to a horizon, for instance.

Or we can contract our field of view.

I can bring my focus to a particular location,

what we call a vergence point, directly in front of me.

Now I’m pointing at the camera directly in front of me.

Okay, we can do that.

We can expand and contract our visual field of view.

Well, we can expand and contract our auditory field of view,

so to speak, or our auditory window.

You can try this next time you are in an environment

that’s rich with noise, meaning lots of different sounds.

You can just tune out all the noise to a background chatter.

You kind of just, you try not focus

on any one particular sound

and you get the background kind of chatter of noise.

And you’ll find that’s actually very relaxing

in comparison to trying to listen to somebody

at a cocktail party and you’re shouting back and forth.

Now, if you’re very, very interested in that person

or getting to know them better or what they’re telling you

or some combination of those things,

then you’ll be very motivated to do it,

but nonetheless it requires energy and effort and attention.

How do we do this?

Well, it’s actually quite simple,

or at least it’s simple in essence,

although the underlying mechanisms are complex.

Here I have to credit the laboratory

of a guy named Mike Weir, W-E-H-R,

up at the University of Oregon,

who essentially figured out that we are able

to accomplish this extraction of particular sounds.

We can really hear one person or a small number of people

amidst a huge background of chatter

because we pay attention to the onset of words,

but also to the offset of words.

Now, the way to visualize this is if the background noise

is just like a bunch of waves of noise,

it’s literally just sound waves coming,

every frequency, low frequency, high frequency,

glasses clinking together.

If you’re at a game, people are shouting,

people are talking on their phone.

There’s the crack of the ball if somebody

actually manages to hit the ball,

the announcer, et cetera.

But whatever we’re paying attention to,

we set up a cone of auditory attention,

a kind of a tunnel of auditory attention

where we are listening, although we don’t realize it,

we are listening for the onset

and the offset of those words.

Now, this is powerful for a couple of reasons.

First of all, it’s a call to arms, so to speak,

to disengage your auditory system

when you don’t need to focus your attention

on something particular.

So if you are somebody, you’re coming home from work,

you’ve had a very long day and you’re trying to make out

a particular conversation on background noise,

you might consider just not having that conversation,

just letting your auditory landscape be very broad,

almost like panoramic vision.

If you’re trying to learn how to extract sound information,

it could be notes of music, it could be scales of music,

it could be words spoken by somebody else.

Maybe somebody is telling you what you need to say

for a particular speech or the information

that you need to learn for a particular topic

and they’re telling it to you.

Deliberately paying attention both to the onset

and to the offset of those words can be beneficial

because it is exactly the way that the auditory system

likes to bring in information.

So one of the more common phenomena

that I think we all experience

is you go to a party and, or you meet somebody new

and you say, hi, I would say, hi, I’m Andrew.

And they’d say, hi, I’m Jeff, for instance.

And they’re great, great to meet you.

And then a minute later, I can’t remember the guy’s name.

Now, is it because I don’t care what his name is?

No, somehow the presence of other auditory information

interfered, it’s not that my mind

was necessarily someplace else.

It’s that the signal to noise, as we say, wasn’t high enough.

Somehow the way he said it

or the way it landed on my ears,

which is really all that matters, right?

When it comes down to learning is such

that it just didn’t achieve high enough signal to noise.

The noise was too high or the signal was too low

or some combination of those.

So the next time you ask somebody’s name,

remember, listen to the onset of what they say

and the offsets.

It would be paying attention to the je in Jeff

and it would be paying attention to the th in F,

in Jeff, excuse me, all right?

And chances are, you’ll be able to remember that name.

Now, I don’t know if people who are super learners

of names do this naturally or not.

I don’t have access to their brains.

I don’t think they’re going to give me access

to their brains either.

But it’s a very interesting way to take the natural biology

of auditory attention and learning and apply it

to scenarios where you’re trying to remember

either people’s names or specific information.

Now, I do acknowledge that trying to learn every word

in a sentence by paying attention to its onset and offset

could actually be kind of disruptive

to the learning process.

So this would be more for specific attention.

Like you’re asking directions in a city and somebody says,

okay, you say you’re lost and they say,

okay, you’re going to go two blocks down,

you’re going to turn left,

and then you’re going to see a landmark on your right,

and then you’re going to go in the third door on your left.

That’s a lot of information, at least for me, okay?

So the way you would want to listen to that

is you’re going to go down the road.

See, I already forgot.

You’re going to go left and you’re just going to program.

And instead of just hearing the word left,

you’re going to think the L at the front of left and the T.

You’re going to left, okay?

And then, so you’re coding in specific words.

And what this does is this kind of hijacks

these naturally occurring attention mechanisms

that the auditory system likes to use.

There’s a little bit of data that for auditory encoding,

this kind of thing can be beneficial.

There are a lot of data

that attention for auditory coding is beneficial.

There are a little bit of data

showing that deliberately encoding auditory information

this way, meaning trying to learn

auditory information this way can be beneficial

or can accelerate learning.

And some of these features of what I’m describing here

map onto some of the work of Mike Merzenich

and others that have been designed

to try and overcome things like stutter

and to treat various forms of auditory learning disorders.

But more importantly, and perhaps more powerful

is the work of Mike Merzenich

that was done with his then graduate student,

Greg Rechenzone, that showed that

using the attentional system,

we can actually learn much faster

and we can actually activate neuroplasticity

in the adult brain,

something that’s very challenging to do.

And that the auditory system is one of the main ways

in which we can access neuroplasticity more broadly.

So I just want to take a couple of minutes

and describe the work of Rechenzone and Merzenich

because it’s absolutely fantastic and fascinating.

What they did is they had subjects

try to learn auditory information,

except that they told them to pay attention

to particular frequencies.

So now you know what frequencies are.

So essentially high-pitched sounds or low-pitched sounds.

What they found was just passively listening

to a bunch of stuff does not allow the brain to change

and for that stuff to be remembered at all.

That’s not a surprise.

We’ve all experienced the phenomenon

of having someone talk

and we see their mouth moving and we’re like,

yeah, this is really important, this is really important.

We’re listening, we’re trying to listen

and then they walk away and we think,

I didn’t get any of that.

And you wonder whether or not it was them.

Maybe this is happening to you right now.

You wonder whether or not it was you.

You wonder whether or not you have trouble with learning

or you have attention deficit.

It could be any number of different things.

But what Rechenzone and Merzenich discovered

was that if you instruct subjects to listen

for particular cues within speech or within sounds,

that not only can you learn those things more quickly,

but that you can remap these tonotopic maps in the cortex

that I referred to earlier.

You actually get changes in the neural architecture,

the neural circuitry in the brain.

And this can occur not only very rapidly,

but they can occur in the adult brain,

which prior to their work

was not thought to be amenable to change.

It was long thought that neuroplasticity

could only occur in the developing brain,

but the work of Rechenzone and Merzenich

in the auditory system actually was some of the first

that really opened up everybody’s eyes and ears

to the idea that the brain can change in adulthood.

So here’s how this sort of process would work

and how you might apply it.

If you are trying to learn music

or you’re trying to learn information

that you’re going to then recite,

you can decide to highlight certain words

or certain frequencies of sound

or certain scales or certain keys on the piano

and to only focus on those for certain learning bouts, okay?

So I’ll give an example that’s sort of real time for me,

meaning it’s happening right now.

I know generally what I want to say when I arrive here.

I even know specifically certain things

that I want to make sure get across to you.

But I don’t think about every single word

that I’m going to say and the precise order

in which I’m going to say those things.

That would be actually very disruptive

because it wouldn’t match my normal patterns of speech

and you’d probably think I was sounding rather robotic

if I were to do that.

So one way that we can remember information

is as we write out, for instance,

something that we want to say,

we can highlight particular words, we can underline those.

If we’re listening to somebody

and they are telling us information,

we can decide just to highlight particular words

that they said to us and write those down.

Now, of course, we’re listening to all the information,

but the work of Rechenzon and Merzenich

and the work of others, in addition to them,

his former student or former postdoc, I don’t know which,

Michael Kilgard, who’s now got his own lab down in Texas,

or others, have shown that the cuing of attention

to particular features of speech,

particular components of speech,

the way in which it increases our level of attention

overall allows us to capture more

of the information overall.

And so I don’t want this to be abstract at all.

What this means is when you’re listening,

you don’t have to listen to every word.

You’re already listening to every word,

all the information’s coming in through your ears.

What you’re trying to extract is particular things

or themes within the content.

So maybe you decide, if you’re listening to me,

that you’re only going to listen to the word tools

or you’re only going to listen to when my voice

kind of goes above background.

You get to decide what you decide to listen to or not.

And what you decide to focus on

isn’t necessarily as important

as the fact that you’re focusing.

So I hope that’s clear.

The auditory system does this all the time

with the cocktail party effect.

What I’m talking about is exporting certain elements

of the mechanisms of the cocktail party effect,

paying attention to the onset and offset of words

or particular notes within music or particular scales,

or you can make it even broader

and particular motifs of music

or particular sentences of words or particular phrases.

And in doing that, you extract more

of the information overall,

even though you’re not paying attention

to all the information at once.

Now I’d like to talk about a phenomenon

that you’ve all experienced before,

which is called Doppler.

So the Doppler effect is the way that we experience sound

when the thing that’s making that sound is moving.

The simplest way to explain this

is to translate the sound into the visual world once again.

So if you’ve ever seen a duck or a goose

sitting in a pond or a lake,

and it’s kind of bobbing up and down,

what you’ll notice is that the ripples of water

that extend out from that duck or goose

are fairly regularly spaced in all directions.

And that’s because that duck or goose is stationary.

It’s moving up and down,

but it’s not moving forward or backward or to the side.

Now, if that duck or goose were to swim forward

by paddling its little webbed feet under the surface,

you would immediately notice that the ripples of water

that are close to and in front of that duck or goose

would be closer together

than the ones that trailed it, that were behind.

And that is essentially what happens with sound as well.

With the Doppler effect,

we experience sounds that are closer to us

at higher frequency.

The ripples are closer together.

And sounds that are further away at lower frequency,

especially when they’re moving past us.

So if you’ve ever, for instance,

heard a siren in the distance.

Nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana.

Nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana, nanana.

That’s essentially my rendition of a siren.

I don’t know what ambulance or police or what,

passing you on a street.

That is the Doppler effect.

The Doppler effect is one of the main ways

that we make out the direction that things are arriving from

and their speeds and trajectories.

And we get very good from a very young age

at discerning what direction things are arriving from

and the direction that they are going to pass us in.

And the Doppler effect has probably saved your life

many, many times.

In this way, you just don’t realize it

because you’ll step off the curb

or you’re driving your car and you pull to the side

so that the ambulance or fire truck can go by

because you heard that siren off in the distance.

And then you pull away from the curb

and you get back on the road,

in part because you don’t see it any longer,

but also you don’t hear any other sirens in the distance.

Now, some animals such as bats are exquisitely good

at navigating their environments according to sound.

Now, we’ve all heard that bats don’t see.

That’s actually not true.

They actually have vision,

but they just rely more heavily on their auditory system.

And the way that bats navigate in the dark

and the way that bats navigate using sound

is through Doppler.

Now, they don’t simply listen

to whether or not things are coming at them

or moving away from them and pay attention to Doppler

like the siren example I gave for you.

What they do is they generate their own sounds.

So a bat, as it flies around, is sending out clicks.

Click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click.

I think that’s my best bat sound, or maybe it’s click,

click, click, click, click, click, click, click, click.

And they’re clicking.

They’re actually propelling sound out

at a particular frequency that they know.

Now, whether or not they’re conscious of it, I don’t know.

I’ve never asked them.

And if I did ask them, I don’t think they could answer.

And if they could answer,

they couldn’t answer in a language that I could understand.

But the bat is essentially flying around,

sending out sound waves,

pinging its environment with sound waves

of a particular frequency.

And then depending on the frequency of sound waves

that come back,

they know if they’re getting closer to an object

or further away from it.

So if they send out sounds at a frequency of,

this was much slower than it would actually occur,

but let’s say one every half second,


And it’s coming back even faster,


Then they know they’re getting closer,

because of the Doppler effect.

And if that comes back more slowly,

they know that there’s nothing in front of them.

So the bat is essentially navigating its world

by creating these auras of sound

that bounce back onto them

from the various objects, trees, et cetera,

buildings, and people.

It’s kind of eerie to think about,

but yes, they see you with,

they experience you with their sound, they sense you.

And they’re using Doppler to accomplish it.

Now I’d like to talk about ringing in the ears.

This is something that I get asked about a lot.

And speaking of signal to noise,

I don’t know if I get asked about it a lot

because many people suffer from ringing in their ears

or because the people who suffer from ringing in their ears

suffer so much that they are more prone to ask.

So it could be a sampling bias, I don’t know,

but I’ve been asked enough times

and some of the experiences of discomfort

that people have expressed

about having this ringing of the ears

really motivated me to go deep into this literature.

So the ringing of the ears that one experiences

is called tinnitus, not tinnitus, but tinnitus.

And tinnitus can vary in intensity

and it can vary according to stress levels.

It can vary across the lifespan or even time of day.

So it’s very subject to kind of background effects

and contextual effects.

So I think we all know that we should do our best

to maximize healthy sleep.

We did a number of episodes on that.

Essentially the first four episodes

of the Huberman Lab podcast were all about sleep

and how to get better sleep.

We all know that we should try and limit our stress.

And we had an episode about stress

and ways to mitigate stress as well.

However, there are people, it seems,

that are suffering from tinnitus

for which stress or lack of sleep

just can’t explain the presence of the tinnitus.

Tinnitus can be caused by disruption to these hair cells

that we talked about earlier or damage to the hair cells.

So that’s another reason why,

even if you have good hearing now,

that you want to protect that hearing

and really avoid putting yourself

into these kind of two-hit environments,

environments where there’s a lot of background noise

and then you add another really loud auditory stimulus.

This also can happen at different times, I should mention.

If you go to a concert

or you listen to loud music with your headphones

and then you go to a concert

or you go into a very loud work environment,

the hair cells can still be vulnerable.

And once those hair cells are knocked out,

currently we don’t have the technology to put them back,

although many groups,

including some excellent groups at Stanford and elsewhere,

too, of course, are working on ways

to replenish those hair cells and restore hearing.

There are treatments for tinnitus

that involve taking certain substances.

There are medications for tinnitus.

In the non-prescription landscape,

which is typically what we discuss on this podcast

when we discuss taking anything,

there are essentially four compounds

for which there are quality peer-reviewed data

where there does not appear to be any overt commercial bias,

meaning that nothing’s reported in the papers

as funding from a particular company.

And those are melatonin, ginkgo bilboa, zinc, and magnesium.

Now, I’ve talked about melatonin before.

I’m personally not a fan of melatonin as a sleep aid,

but there are four studies.

First one entitled,

The Effects of Melatonin on Tinnitus and Sleep.

Second one, Treatment of Sensual and Sensory Neural Tinnitus

with Orally Administered Melatonin.

And then the title goes on much longer,

but it’s a randomized study.

I’m not going to read out all of these.

Melatonin, Can It Stop the Ringing?

Which is an interesting article, double-blinded study.

And The Effects of Melatonin on Tinnitus.

Each one of these studies has anywhere from 30

to more than 100 subjects, in one case, 102 subjects,

both genders, as they list them out.

Typically, it’s listed as sex, not gender in studies,

so it should say both sexes, but nonetheless.

And age range anywhere from 30 years old

all the way up to 65 plus.

I didn’t see any studies of people younger than 30.

All three focused on melatonin,

not surprisingly because of the titles.

Looking at a range of dosages,

anywhere from three milligrams per day,

which is sort of typical of many supplements for melatonin,

still much higher than one would manufacture endogenously

through your own pineal gland.

But three milligrams in these studies

for a duration of anywhere from 30 days

to much longer in some cases, six months.

And all four of these studies found modest,

yet still statistically significant effects

of taking melatonin by mouth,

so it’s orally administered melatonin,

in reducing the severity of tinnitus.

So that’s compelling, at least to me.

It doesn’t sound like a cure.

And of course, as always, I’m not a physician.

I’m a scientist, so I don’t prescribe anything.

I only profess things.

I report to you the science.

You have to decide if melatonin is right for you

if you have tinnitus.

And certainly I say that both to protect myself,

but also protect you.

You’re responsible for your health and wellbeing.

And I’m not telling anyone to run out

and start taking melatonin for tinnitus,

but it does seem that it can have some effects

in reducing its symptoms.

Ginkgo-Boa-Boa is an interesting compound.

It’s been prescribed for or recommended

for many, many things.

But there are a few studies, again,

double-blinded studies lasting one to six months,

one that has an impressive number of subjects,

978 subjects ranging from age 18 all the way up to 65,

so on and so forth,

that show not huge effects of ginkgo,

but as they quote,

“‘Limited evidence suggests that if tinnitus

is a side effect of something else,

in particular cognitive decline,

so age-related tinnitus might be helped by ginkgo-Boa-Boa.’”

I won’t go through all the details of the zinc studies,

but it seems that zinc supplementation at higher levels

than are typical of most people’s intakes,

so 50 milligrams per day,

do appear to be able to reduce subjective symptoms

of tinnitus in most of the people

that took the supplemented zinc.

There aren’t a lot of studies on that,

so I could only find one double-blinded study.

It lasted anywhere from one to six months, 41 subjects,

both genders listed out again here, 45 to 64,

and they saw a decrease in the severity of tinnitus symptoms

with 50 milligrams of elemental zinc supplementation.

And then last but not least is the magnesium study.

Again, only a single study.

It’s a phase two study,

looking at a fairly limited number of subjects,

so only 19 subjects,

taking 532 milligrams of elemental magnesium.

For those of you that take magnesium,

there’s magnesium and elemental magnesium,

and it’s always translated on the bottle,

but it was associated with a lessening of symptoms

related to tinnitus.

So for you tinnitus sufferers out there,

you may already be aware of this.

You may already be taking these things

and had no positive effects,

meaning they didn’t help, maybe not.

I hope that you’ll at least consider these,

talk to your doctor about them.

I do realize that tinnitus is extremely disruptive.

I can’t say I empathize because I don’t,

from a place of experience, that is,

because I don’t have tinnitus,

but for those of you that don’t, including myself,

you can imagine that hearing sounds

of things that aren’t there

and the ringing in one’s ears can be very disruptive,

and I think would be very disruptive,

and it explains why people with tinnitus

reach out so often with questions

about how to alleviate that,

and I hope this information was useful to you.

I’d like to now talk about balance

and our sense of balance,

which is controlled by, believe it or not,

our ears and things in our ears,

as well as by our brain and elements of our spinal cord.

But before I do that, I want to ask you another question,

or I would rather I’d like to ask you

to ask yourself a question and answer it,

which is, how big are your ears?

Turns out that the ears grow our entire life.

In the early stage of our life, they grow more slowly,

and then as we age, they grow more quickly.

You may have noticed if you have family members

who are well into their 70s and 80s,

and if you’re fortunate and you’re into their 90s

and maybe even 100s,

is that the ears of some of these individuals

get very, very big relative to their previous ear sizes.

It turns out that biological age

can actually be measured according to ear size.

Now, you have to take a few measurements,

but believe it or not,

there is a formula in the scientific literature.

If you know your ear circumference,

so the distance around your ear, ears, plural,

presumably you have two, most people do, in millimeters.

So you’re going to take the circumference

of your ears in millimeters.

How would you do this, right?

How would you do this?

Maybe you take a string and you put it around your ear,

and then you measure the string.

That’s probably going to be easier

than marching around your ear

or somebody else’s ear with a ruler

and measuring in millimeters.

So what’s your ear circumference?

On the outside, don’t go in on the divot or anything,

you’re just going around

as if you were going to trace the closest fitting oval,

assuming your ears are oval,

closest fitting oval that matches your ear circumference.

Take that number in millimeters, subtract from it.

Oh, excuse me, I should do this correctly.

Do that for both ears, add them together,

add those numbers together, divide by two,

get the average for your two ears,

get your average ear circumference

for across your two ears.

Then take that number in millimeters, subtract 88.1,

and then whatever value that is,

multiply it times 1.96,

and that will tell you your biological age.

Now, why in the world would this be accurate?

Well, as we age,

there are changes in number of different biological pathways.

One of those pathways is the pathways

related to collagen synthesis.

So not only are our ears growing,

but our noses are growing too.

My nose seems to be growing a lot,

but then again, I did sports where I would get my nose

broken, something I don’t recommend.

So I always point out,

you don’t get a nose like mine doing yoga.

But nonetheless, my nose is still growing

and my ears are still growing,

and I suspect as I get older,

if I have the good fortune of living into my 80s and 90s,

my ears are going to continue to grow.

A comparison between chronological age and biological age

is something that’s of really deep interest these days.

And the work of David Sinclair

at Harvard Medical School and others,

so-called Horvath clocks that people have developed,

have tapped into how the epigenome and the genome

can give us some insight into our biological age

and how that compares to our chronological age.

Most of us know our chronological age

because we know when we were born

and we know where we are relative to that now.

But you can start to make a little chart, if you like,

about your rates of ear growth.

Your rates of ear growth actually correlate pretty well

with your rates of biological progression

through this thing that we call life.

So it’s not something that we think about too often,

but just like our DNA and our epigenome

and some other markers of metabolic health

and hormone health relate to our age,

so does our collagen synthesis.

And one of the places that shows up the most

is in these two little goodies on the sides of our heads,

which are our ears.

So even though it’s a little bit of a bizarre metric,

it makes perfect sense in the biological context.

So let’s talk about balance

and how to get better at balancing.

The reason why we’re talking about balance

and how to get better at balancing

in the episode about hearing

is that all the goodies that are going to allow you

to do that are in your ears.

They’re also in your brain,

but they’re mostly in your ears.

So as you recall from the beginning of this episode,

you have two cochlea, cochleas,

that are one on each side of your head,

and that’s a little spiral snail-shaped thing

that converts sound waves into electrical signals

that the rest of your brain can understand.

Right next to those,

you have what are called semicircular canals.

The semicircular canals can be best visualized

as thinking about three hula hoops with marbles in them.

So imagine that you have a hula hoop,

and it’s not filled with marbles all the way around.

It’s just got some marbles down there at the base, okay?

So if you were to move that hula hoop around,

the marbles will move around.

Shoo, shoo, shoo, okay?

You’ve got three of those,

and each one of those hula hoops

has these marbles that can move around.

One of those hula hoops is positioned vertically

with respect to gravity.

So it’s basically parallel to your nose.

It sits like this if you’re watching on a video,

but basically it’s upright.

Another one of those hula hoops

is basically at a 90-degree angle to your nose.

It’s basically parallel to the floor

if you’re standing upright now, if you’re seated, okay?

And the other one is kind of tilted

about 45 degrees in between those.

Now, why is the system there?

Well, those marbles within each one of those hula hoops

can move around, but they’ll only move around

if your head moves in a particular way.

And there are three planes or three ways

that your head can move.

Your head can move up and down,

like I’m nodding right now, so that’s called pitch.

It’s pitching forward or pitching back, okay?

So it’s a nod up and down.

Or I can shake my head no, side to side.

That’s called yaw.

You pilots will be very familiar with this, yaw.

Not yawn, yaw.

And then there’s roll, tilting the head from side to side,

the way that a cute puppy might look at you

from side to side, okay?

Or if somebody doesn’t really understand

or believe what you’re saying,

they might tilt their head, very common phenomenon.

I mean, no one does that to me,

but they do that to each other.

So pitch, yaw, and roll are the movements of the head

in each of the three major planes of motion, as we say.

And each one of those causes those marbles

to move in one or two of the various hula hoops, okay?

So if I move my head up and down when I nod,

one of those hula hoops, literally right now,

the marbles are moving back and forth.

They aren’t actually marbles, by the way.

These are little, kind of like little stones, basically,

little calcium-like deposits.

And when they roll back and forth,

they deflect little hairs, little hair cells

that aren’t like the hair cells

that we use for measuring sound waves.

They’re not too different,

but they are different from them.

Not like the hairs on our heads,

but they’re basically rolling past these little hair cells

and causing them to deflect.

And when they deflect downward, the neurons,

because hair cells are neurons,

send information up to the brain.

So if I move my head like this,

there’s a physical movement of these little stones

in this hula hoop, as I’m referring to it,

but they deflect these hairs,

send those hairs, which are neurons, those hair cells,

send information off to the brain.

If I move my head from side to side,

different little stones move.

If I roll my head, different stones move.

This is an exquisite system

that exists in all animals that have a jaw.

So any fish that has a jaw has this system.

A puppy has this system.

Any animal that has a jaw has this so-called balance system,

which we call the vestibular system.

One of the more important things to know

about the vestibular, the balance system,

is that it works together with the visual system.

Let’s say I hear something off to my left

and I swing my head over to the left to see what it is.

There are two sources of information

about where my head is relative to my body,

and I need to know that.

First of all, when I quickly move my head to the side,

those little stones, as I’m referring to them,

I realize they’re not actually stones,

but as I’m referring to them,

they quickly activate those hair cells

in that one semicircular canal

and send a signal off to my brain

that my head just moved to the side like this.

Not that it went like this and pitched back

or not that it tilted, but it just moved to the side.

But also visual information slid past my field of view.

I didn’t have to think about it,

but just slid past my field of view.

And when those two signals combine,

my eyes then lock to a particular location.

Now, if this is at all complicated,

you can actually uncouple these things.

It’s very easy to do.

You can do this right now.

In fact, I’d like you to do this experiment

if you’re not already doing something else

that requires your attention.

And certainly don’t do this if you’re driving, okay?

You’re going to sit down

and you’re going to move your head to the left very slowly.

You’re going with your eyes open.

So you’re going to move it very, very slowly.

The whole thing should take about five, six,

maybe even 10 seconds to complete.

Okay, I just did it.

Now I’m going to do it very quickly.

I’d like you to do it very quickly as well.

Now do it slowly again.

Okay, what you probably noticed

is that it’s very uncomfortable to do it slowly,

but you can do it very quickly

without much discomfort at all.

You just move your head to the side.

The reason is when you move your head very slowly,

those little stones at the base of that hula hoop,

they don’t get enough momentum to move.

So you’re actually not generating

this signal to the brain that your head is moving.

And what you’ll notice is that your eyes have to go,

boom, boom, boom, jumping over step by step.

Whereas if you move your head really quickly,

the signal gets off to your brain

and your eyes just go, boom,

right to the location you want to look at.

So moving your body slowly is actually very disruptive

to the vestibular system.

And it’s very disruptive to your visual system.

Now, if you’ve ever had the misfortune of being on a boat

and you’re going through big oscillations on the boat,

for those of you seasick, folks that get seasick,

this can actually make certain people seasick

just to hear about it.

That was big oscillations going up and down

and up and down.

Those are very disruptive.

We’ll talk about nausea in a minute

and how to offset that kind of nausea.

I get pretty seasick,

but there are ways that you can deal with this.

But this is incredible

because what it means is it’s a purely physical system

of these little stones rolling around in there

and directing where your eyes should go, okay?

So you can do this also just by looking up.

So let’s just say you’re sitting in a chair,

you’re going to look up towards the ceiling

and your eyes will just go there.

You’re doing this eyes open and you look down.

Now try doing it really, really slowly.

Some people even get motion sick doing this,

which if you do, then just stop, okay?

So you can do this also to the side,

although it works best

if you’re moving your head from side to side

or nodding up and down.

So what we’re doing here

is we’re uncoupling these two mechanisms.

We’re pulling them apart,

the visual part and the vestibular part,

just to illustrate to you that normally

these mechanisms in your inner ear

tell your eyes where to go,

but as well, your eyes tell your balance system,

your vestibular system, how to function.

So I’d like you to do a different experiment.

I’m not going to do it right now,

but basically stand up.

If you get the opportunity,

you can do this safely wherever you are.

You’re going to stand up

and you’re going to look forward about 10, 12 feet.

You can pick a point on a wall

or you can, you know, anywhere that you like.

If you’re out in public, you know, just do it anyway.

You know, just tell them you’re listening

to Huberman Lab Podcast

and someone’s telling you to do it.

Anyway, if you don’t want to do it, don’t do it,

but basically do it.

Stand on one leg and lift up the other leg.

You can bend your knee if you like

and just look off into the distance about 10, 12 feet.

If you can do that, if you can stand on one leg,

now close your eyes.

Chances are you’re going to suddenly feel

what scientists call postural sway.

You’re going to start swaying around a lot.

It is very hard to balance with your eyes closed.

You might think, well, and if you think about that,

it’s like, why is that?

That’s crazy.

Why would it be that it’s hard to balance

with your eyes closed?

Well, information about the visual world

also feeds back onto this vestibular system.

So the vestibular system informs your vision

and tells you where to move your eyes

and your eyes and their positioning

tell your balance system, your vestibular system,

how it should function.

So there’s a really cool way

that you can learn to optimize balance.

You’re not going to try and do this

by learning to balance with your eyes closed.

What you can do is you can raise one leg

and you can look at a short distance,

maybe off to just the distance that your thumb would be

if you were to reach your arm out in front of you,

although you don’t necessarily have to put your thumb

in front of you.

So maybe just about two feet in front of you.

Then while still balancing,

you’re going to step your vision out a further distance

and then a further distance.

And as far as you can possibly see in the environment

that you’re in,

and then you’re going to march it back to you.

Now, what the literature shows

is that this kind of balance training

where you incorporate the visual system

and extending out and then marching back in

to the point at which you direct your visual focus

sends robust information

about the relationship between your visual world

and your balance system.

And of course, the balance system includes

not just these hula hoops, these semicircular canals,

but they communicate with the cerebellum,

this so-called mini brain,

actually means mini brain in the back of your brain,

combines that with visual information

and your map of the body surface.

That pattern of training is very beneficial

for enhancing your ability to balance

because the ability to balance is in part

the activation of particular postural muscles,

but just as much, perhaps even more so,

it’s about being able to adjust those postural muscles,

excuse me, it’s about the ability

to adjust those postural muscles

as you experience changes in your visual world.

And one of the most robust ways

that you can engage changes in your visual world

is through your own movement.

And so most people are not trying to balance in place.

They’re not just trying to stand there

like a statue on one leg.

Most of what we think about when we think about balance

is for sake of sport or dynamic balance

of being able to break ourselves

and when we’re lunging in one particular direction

to stop ourselves, that is,

and then to move in another direction

or for skateboarding or surfing or cycling

or any number of different things, gymnastics.

So the visual system is the primary input

by which you develop balance,

but you can’t do it just with the visual system.

So what I’m recommending is if you’re interested

in cultivating a sense of balance,

understand the relationship

between these semicircular canals.

Understand that they are both driving eye movements

and they are driven by eye movements.

It’s a reciprocal relationship.

And then even just two or three minutes a day

or every once in a while, even three times a week,

maybe five minutes, maybe 10 minutes, you pick.

But if you want to enhance balance,

you have to combine changes in your visual environment

with a static posture, standing on one leg

and shifting your visual environment

or static visual view,

looking at one thing and changing your body posture, okay?

So those two things we now know

from the scientific literature combine

in order to give an enhanced sense of balance.

And there’s a really nice paper that was published in 2015

called Effects of Balance Training on Balance Performance.

This was in Healthy Adults.

It’s a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis is when you combine a lot of literature

from a lot of different papers

and extract the really robust

and the less robust statistical effects.

So it’s a really nice paper.

As well, there are some papers out there,

for instance, Comparison of Static Balance

and the Role of Vision in the Elite Athletes.

This is essentially the paper that I’ve extracted

most of the information that I just gave you from.

And that paper, and there are some others as well,

but basically I distilled them down

into their core components.

The core components are move your vision around

while staying static still,

but in a balanced position, like standing on one leg.

Could be something more complicated

if you’re somebody who can do more complicated movements.

Unilateral movements seem to be important.

So standing on one leg as opposed to both, right?

Or trying to generate some tilt

is another way to go about it,

or imbalance, meaning one limb asymmetrically

being activated compared to the other limb.

And then the other way to encourage or to cultivate

and build up this vestibular system

and your sense of balance

actually involves movement itself, acceleration.

So that’s what we’re going to talk about now.

So up until now, I’ve been talking about balance

only in the static sense,

like standing on one leg, for instance,

but that’s a very artificial situation.

Even though you can train balance that way,

most people who want to enhance their sense of balance

for sport or dance or some other endeavor

want to engage balance in a dynamic way,

meaning moving through lots of different planes of movement,

maybe even sometimes while squatting down low

or jumping and landing or making trajectories

that are different angles.

For that, we need to consider that the vestibular system

also cares about acceleration.

So it cares about head position,

it cares about eye position and where the eyes are

and where you’re looking,

but it also cares about what direction you’re moving

and how fast.

And one of the best things that you can do

to enhance your sense of balance

is to start to bring together your visual system,

the semicircular canals of the inner ear

and what we call linear acceleration.

So if I move forward in space rigidly upright,

it’s a vastly different situation

than if I’m leaning to the side.

One of the best ways to cultivate

a better sense of balance, literally,

within the sense organs and the neurons

and the biology of the brain

is to get into modes where we are accelerating forward,

typically it’s forward,

while also tilted with respect to gravity.

Now, this would be the carve on a skateboard

or on a surfboard or a snowboard.

This would be the taking a corner on a bike

while being able to lean safely, of course,

lean into the turn so that your head is actually tilted

with respect to the earth.

So anytime that we are rigidly upright,

we aren’t really exercising

the vestibular system and balance.

This is why, you know, you see people in the gym on these,

what are those?

Bouncy balls?

Bouncy ball is the one that the guys roll in the park,


Bouncy balls where they’re balancing back and forth.

That won’t work the small stabilizing muscles.

But what I’m talking about is getting into modes

where you actually tilt the body and the head

with respect to earth.

What I mean is with respect to earth’s gravitational pull.

Now, the cerebellum is a very interesting structure

because not only is it involved in balance,

but it’s also involved in skill learning

and in generating timing of movements.

It’s a fascinating structure deserving of an entire episode

or several episodes all on its own.

But some of the outputs of the cerebellum,

meaning the neurons in the cell cerebellum get inputs,

but they also send information out.

The outputs of the cerebellum are strongly linked

to areas of the brain that release neuromodulators

that make us feel really good,

in particular, serotonin and dopamine.

And this is an early emerging subfield within neuroscience,

but a lot of what are called the non-motor outputs

of the cerebellum have a profound influence,

not just on our ability to learn how to balance better,

but also how we feel overall.

So for you exercisers out there,

I do hope people are getting regular,

healthy amounts of exercise.

We’ve talked about what that means in previous episodes.

So at least 150 minutes a week of endurance work,

some strength training,

a minimum of five sets per body part

to maintain musculature.

Even if you don’t want to grow muscles,

you want to do that in order to maintain healthy strength

and bones, et cetera.

If you’re doing that,

but you’re only doing things like curls in the gym,

squats in the gym, riding the Peloton,

or even if you’re outside running

and you’re getting forward acceleration,

but you’re never actually getting tilted, right?

You’re never actually getting tilted

with respect to Earth’s gravitational pull.

You’re not really exercising

and getting the most out of your nervous system.

Activation of the cerebellum in this way of being tilted

or the head being tilted and the body being tilted

while in acceleration, typically forward acceleration,

but sometimes side to side,

has a profound and positive effect

on our sense of mood and wellbeing.

And as I talked about in previous episode,

it can also enhance our ability to learn information

in the period after generating those tilts

and the acceleration.

And that’s because the cerebellum has these outputs

to these areas of the brain

that release these neuromodulators

like serotonin and dopamine,

and they make us feel really good.

I think this is one of the reasons why growing up,

I had some friends, some of whom might’ve been,

the world heavyweight champions of laziness

for essentially everything,

except they would wake up at 4.30 in the morning

to go surf.

They would like drive.

They would get up so early to go surf.

It’s not just surfers.

And some surfers, by the way, I should point out

are not lazy humans.

They do a lot of other things,

but I knew people that couldn’t be motivated

to do anything,

but they were highly driven to get into these experiences

of forward acceleration while tilted

with respect to gravity.

Likewise, with snowboarding or skiing or cycling,

those modes of exercise seem to have an outsized effect

both on our wellbeing and our ability to translate

the vestibular balance that we achieve in those endeavors

to our ability to balance while doing other things.

So, and I don’t mean psychological balance necessarily.

I mean, physical balance.

So for those of you that don’t think of yourselves

as very coordinated or with very good balance,

getting into these modes of acceleration,

forward movement or lateral movement while getting tilted,

even if you have to do it slowly, could be beneficial.

I do believe, and the scientific literature points

to the fact that it will be beneficial

for cultivating better sense of physical balance.

It can really build up the circuits

of this vestibular system.

And then of course, the feel good components

of acceleration while tilted or while getting the head

into different orientations relative to gravity.

Well, that’s the explanation for roller coasters.

Some people hate roller coasters.

They make them feel nauseous.

Many people love roller coasters.

And one of the reasons they love roller coasters

is because of the way that when you get the body,

even if you’re not generating the movement,

you get the body into forward acceleration

and you’re going upside down and tilted to the side

as the tracks go from side to side and tilt, et cetera,

you’re getting activation of these deeper brain nuclei

that trigger the release of neuromodulators

that just make us feel really, really good.

In fact, some people get a long arc,

a long duration kind of buzz

from having gone through those experiences.

Some people who hate roller coasters

are probably getting nauseous just hearing about that.

So I encourage people to get into modes of acceleration

while tilted every once in a while,

provided you can do it safely.

It’s an immensely powerful way to build up your skills

in the realm of balance.

And it’s also, for most people, very, very pleasing.

It feels really good because of the chemical relationship

between forward acceleration and head tilt and body tilt.

Now, speaking of feeling nauseous,

some people suffer from vertigo.

Some people feel dizzy.

Some people get lightheaded.

An important question to ask yourself always

if you’re feeling quote-unquote dizzy or lightheaded is,

are you dizzy or are you lightheaded?

Now, we’re not going to diagnose anything here

because there’s just no way we can do that.

This is essentially me shouting into a tunnel,

so we don’t know what’s going on

with each and every one of you.

But if ever you feel that your world is spinning,

but that you can focus on your thumb, for instance,

but the rest of the world is spinning

and your thumb is stationary, that’s called being dizzy.

Now, if you feel like you’re falling

or that you feel like you need to get down onto the ground

because you feel lightheaded, that’s being lightheaded.

And oftentimes with language,

we don’t distinguish between being dizzy

and being lightheaded.

Now, there are a lot of ways that dizziness

and lightheadedness can occur.

And I don’t even want to begin to guess

at the number of different things and ways

that it could happen for those of you that suffer from it,

because it could be any number of them.

But oftentimes if people are lightheaded,

yes, it could be low blood sugar.

It could also be that you’re dehydrated.

It could also be that you are low in electrolytes.

We talked about this in a previous episode,

but we will talk about it more in a future episode.

Many people have too little sodium in their system, salt,

and that’s why they feel lightheaded.

I have family members who for years

thought they had disrupted blood sugar.

They would get shaky, jittery, lightheaded,

feel like they were nauseous, et cetera.

And simply the addition of a little sea salt to their water

remedied the problem entirely.

I don’t think it’s going to remedy

every issue of lightheadedness out there by any stretch,

but just the addition of salt in this particular case

helped the person, and they are not alone.

Many people who think that they have low blood sugar

actually are lightheaded because of low electrolytes

and because of the way that salt carries water

into the system and creates changes in blood volume,

et cetera, low sodium can often be a source

of lightheadedness, as can low blood sugar,

and of course, other things as well.

Now for dizziness or seasickness,

we were all taught that you need to pick a point

on the horizon and focus on it,

but actually that’s not correct.

It is true that if you are down in the cabin of a boat

or you’re on the lower deck,

and all you can see are things up close to you,

that getting sloshed around like so,

or the boat going up and down like so,

I think I’m getting a little seasick

even as I do this and I describe it.

Focusing on things close to you can be problematic.

And in that case, the advice to go up on deck

and get fresh air and to look off into the horizon,

that part is correct.

But focusing your eyes on a particular location

on the horizon is effectively like trying

to move very slowly as I had you do before,

where you’re trying to move your head very slowly

while fixating on one location.

Your eyes and your balance system

were designed to move together.

So really what you want to do is allow your visual system

to track with your vestibular system.

This is why sitting in the back of an Uber or a taxi

and being on your phone

can make you suddenly feel very nauseous.

Sometimes the cabs, particularly in New York City,

they have a lot of occluders.

They have a lot of stuff blocking your field of view.

There’s usually a little portal out

that where you can see out to the front of the windshield,

but there’s all this stuff now.

Television’s in the backseat

and you’re watching that television and the cab is moving.

You’re in linear acceleration

and sometimes you’re taking corners, you’re braking.

So then your vestibular system has to adjust to that.

If you’re looking at your phone or a book

or even if you’re talking to somebody,

actually I’m starting to feel a little nauseous

I promise I’m not going to finish this episode

by vomiting at the end, at least not here.

But what can happen is that you’re uncoupling

the visual information from your motion,

from your vestibular information.

You want those to be coupled.

This is why a lot of people have to drive.

They can’t be in the passenger seat

because when you drive,

you also get what’s called proprioceptive feedback.

Your body is sending signals also to the vestibular system

about where you are in space.

When you’re the passenger,

you’re just getting jolted around as the person is driving.

And if you’re looking at your phone, it’s even worse.

And if you’re looking at the occluder between you

and the two front seats, that’s even worse.

So this is why staring out the front windshield is great

but you don’t want to fixate.

Okay, so hopefully I spared a few people

and hopefully a few cab drivers

of having people get sick in their cars or Ubers.

Let your visual system

and your vestibular system work together.

If appropriate, get into linear acceleration

and you’ll improve your sense of balance.

Once again, we’ve covered a tremendous amount of information.

Now you know how you hear,

how you make sense of the sounds in your environment,

how those come into your ears

and how your brain processes them.

In addition, we talked about things

like low-level white noise and even binaural beats

which can be used to enhance certain brain states,

certain rhythms within the brain,

and even dopamine release in ways that allow you

to learn better.

And we talked about the balance system

and this incredible relationship

between your vestibular apparatus,

meaning the portions of your inner ear

that are responsible for balance

and your visual system and gravity.

And you can use those to enhance your learning as well,

as well as just to enhance your sense of balance.

If you’re learning from this podcast,

please subscribe on YouTube, that really helps us.

In addition, please leave us any comments or feedback

or suggestions for future episode content on YouTube

in the comment section.

If you haven’t already subscribed on Apple and Spotify,

please do that as well.

And on Apple, you have the opportunity

to leave us up to a five-star review.

At Apple, you can also leave us comments and feedback.

In addition, if you’d like to support the podcast,

please check out our sponsors mentioned

at the beginning of the episode.

That is absolutely the best way to support us.

Last but not least,

I’d like to thank you for your time and attention

and desire and willingness to learn

about vision and balance.

And of course, thank you for your interest in science.

And as mentioned at the beginning of today’s episode,

we are now partnered with Momentous Supplements

because they make single ingredient formulations

that are of the absolute highest quality

and they ship international.

If you go to slash Huberman,

you will find many of the supplements

that have been discussed on various episodes

of the Huberman Lab Podcast,

and you will find various protocols

related to those supplements.

comments powered by Disqus