Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,
where we discuss science
and science-based tools for everyday life.
I’m Andrew Huberman,
and I’m a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology
at Stanford School of Medicine.
Today is an Ask Me Anything episode, or AMA.
This is part of our premium subscriber channel.
Our premium subscriber channel was started
in order to provide support
for this standard Huberman Lab Podcast,
which comes out every Monday
and is available at zero cost to everybody
on all standard feeds, YouTube, Apple, Spotify, and elsewhere.
We also started the premium channel
as a way to generate support for exciting research
being done at Stanford and elsewhere,
research on human beings
that leads to important discoveries
that assist mental health, physical health, and performance.
I’m also pleased to inform you that for every dollar
the Huberman Lab premium channel generates
for research studies,
the TINY Foundation has agreed to match that amount,
so now we are able to double the total amount of funding
given to studies of mental health, physical health,
and human performance.
If you’d like to subscribe
to the Huberman Lab Podcast premium channel,
please go to hubermanlab.com slash premium.
It is $10 a month to subscribe,
or you can pay $100 all at once
to get an entire 12-month subscription for a year.
We also have a lifetime subscription model
that is a one-time payment,
and again, you can find that option
at hubermanlab.com slash premium.
For those of you that are already subscribers
to the premium channel,
please go to hubermanlab.com slash premium
and download the premium subscription feed.
And for those of you
that are not Huberman Lab Podcast premium subscribers,
you can still hear the first 20 minutes of today’s episode
and determine whether or not
becoming a premium subscriber is for you.
And now without further ado,
I will answer your questions,
and as always, I will strive to be as thorough as possible,
as clear as possible, and as concise as possible.
Our first question is about abstaining from thoughts,
and in answering this question,
we’re going to skirt right up against a topic
that I’ve covered before on the podcast,
which is obsessive-compulsive disorder,
which is a very serious disorder.
I mean, it can have a range of severity,
but people with true OCD suffer a lot from obsessions,
these are intrusive thoughts, and compulsions,
which are the behaviors
typically associated with those thoughts.
I think it’s really important
that we define OCD really clearly
so that we can make sure
that we’re talking about intrusive thoughts
and the desire to abstain from thoughts versus OCD
and where there might be some overlap there.
The functional definition of OCD
that really pertains to the disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder,
OCD, as opposed to, you know, we call people neurotic,
or we say, you have OCD,
or I’m so OCD about this, or OCD about that,
that’s become kind of a common use of the acronym OCD.
But true OCD is a situation
in which the engaging in a particular compulsive behavior
does not serve to reduce the intensity
or the frequency of the obsessions.
In fact, it makes it worse, okay?
So the typical thing that we hear these days is,
oh, you’re so OCD, or he’s so OCD, or she’s so OCD,
or I’m so OCD.
Now, if someone is OCD in that sense, okay,
so not the clinical disorder,
but OCD in the sense that, you know, they’re really clean,
they’re really fastidious, they need everything perfect.
However, that person can achieve some level of calm
and comfort that’s fairly long lasting
if everything’s clean and perfect.
Well, then that’s not obsessive-compulsive disorder.
This is really important to understand
as we venture into answering the question
about intrusive thoughts
and the desire to abstain from certain thoughts.
A person with true OCD will keep cleaning and cleaning,
or washing their hands,
or arranging things at perfect right angles,
but the more they do it, the more their anxiety goes up.
A person who has more typical,
gosh, we don’t really even have a language
for this nowadays, unfortunately,
but the sort of person that’s extremely particular,
they need things a certain way,
and they’re very driven to resolve things and do things
to make sure that things are done in a certain way
or handled in a certain way.
Well, if that person can experience relief
from engaging in, let’s say, exercise or from cleaning,
you’d say, you’re so OCD about exercise.
Well, but if exercising for an hour
or even two hours in the morning
makes somebody really calm the rest of the day
and they don’t need to exercise,
well, then they’re not necessarily true OCD.
They don’t necessarily have a disorder related to exercise.
However, if they’re exercising for two hours in the morning
and then they find they can’t concentrate on other things
and their desire to exercise just increases and increases
and becomes intrusive for them,
disrupting their quality of life throughout the day,
well, then that’s falling under the umbrella
of what we would call a true disorder.
Okay, so we want to highlight that
because the question is about
a desire to abstain from thoughts.
And the question is,
in your discussion with Dr. Anna Lembke,
and I should just mention Dr. Anna Lembke
is the director of our Dual Diagnosis Addiction Clinic
at Stanford University School of Medicine.
She’s the author of this incredible book,
“‘Dopamine Nation,’ that I think everybody should read.
I do believe everyone should read that book.
So important for the addict and non-addict alike
because it deals with basically
the state of our life nowadays.
We’re living in this dopamine rich world
where we can quickly become dopamine depleted,
which is terrible, leads to depression,
in addition to things like addiction in some folks, et cetera.
Anna was a guest on the podcast.
You can find her episode at hubermanlab.com.
Just put Anna.
I think she’s the only guest we’ve had thus far
whose name is Anna.
So it’ll just pop up there.
The entire website is searchable.
But if you want to listen to that episode
or watch that episode, you can access it hubermanlab.com.
The question is, in your discussion with Dr. Anna Lembke,
you were talking about abstaining
from people’s drug of choice for 30 days
to reset the dopamine reward pathway.
And indeed that is the prescriptive
that Dr. Anna Lembke gives for most all addictions
and for people that are suffering from mild
or even severe depression related
to dopamine seeking behaviors,
social media, video games, sex, food, et cetera.
However, of course, in the instance of food
or in some other addictions,
you can’t abstain for 30 days, right?
That would be terrible to abstain for food for 30 days.
I’m sure people have done it, but it is not healthy to do.
Certain things like alcohol and drugs,
people can abstain for 30 days
in efforts to never go back to them again.
There are cases of severe alcohol or opiate dependence
where people can’t go cold turkey or they risk dying.
So there they need to really work with a physician.
But the 30 day reset of the dopamine system
is something that’s very real.
And that pertains to most people.
That is, it’s going to be very effective
for most people struggling with either behavioral,
what are sometimes called process addictions
or other types of addictions,
including substance abuse issues.
The question continues,
you said you were going to ask Anna how to abstain
if your drug of choice is a thought or narrative
as opposed to a substance or a behavior.
The question continues,
as far as I can tell your discussion with Anna moved on
before you asked her the question.
Would you be able to discuss strategies
for abstaining from addictive thoughts and narratives?
Okay, so let’s talk about intrusive thoughts
and let’s start off by asking ourselves,
what is a thought?
Okay, in the realm of neurobiology,
we have sensations,
which are the processes by which our neurons,
nerve cells convert light photons, sound waves,
touch, mechanical pressure, et cetera,
into electrical signals and chemical signals
that head into our nervous system, including our brain.
And then our brain, at least we think makes sense of them
and help us navigate the world that we’re in.
Okay, so the sensation part
is a pure transformation of mechanical information
or in some cases, chemical information, like smell,
chemicals, literally volatile chemicals
floating around in the world
are brought into your nose
and your neurons in your olfactory bulb
convert those into electrical and chemical signals
that your brain can understand.
Perceptions are your idea
of what those signals out in the world are,
either because you’re paying attention to them
or for some other reason,
you decide that a stop sign in front of you is red
and that the sign behind it is white
and that the sky is blue or cloudy.
Those are perceptions, okay?
So we have sensations and perceptions.
Then we have emotions,
which are these things that include the mind and body
that are related to neuromodulators
like dopamine, serotonin, et cetera,
although those chemicals do other things as well.
And then of course we have behaviors, actions,
everything from me moving my pen on a piece of paper
to walking, running, et cetera.
Thoughts are a fifth category of neural functioning
that we really need to define,
but that doesn’t have as strict a definition
as sensations, perceptions, or feeling, or action.
But thoughts are real, right?
We all know this, thoughts are real.
And one way that we can define thoughts
is that thoughts are perceptions
that include data from the past, present, or future, okay?
Or combinations of past and present
or present and future or future and past, okay?
I’m not trying to give
an overly complicated definition here,
but if we are going to answer a question
about how to abstain from thoughts
in a really direct and actionable way,
we really need to address what are thoughts.
So thoughts are perceptions
that are generated internally, right?
We don’t need any external sensation
in order to have a thought.
We can close our eyes.
We could be in sensory isolation for that matter.
We can be floating with no gravity,
and we can have a thought.
Thoughts tend to run pretty much automatically
in the background all the time.
Some people refer to this as chatter
in the back of our minds in a very unstructured way.
And then if we force our thoughts to be structured
because we decide they need to be,
or if something in our environment captures our perception,
then our thoughts tend to be structured.
Let me give you an example.
If I’m just walking around,
if there were a way in which we could broadcast my thoughts
onto a screen, I hope we wouldn’t do that,
but those thoughts would be a mixture
of semi-complete sentences and gibberish.
However, if somebody stops me and says,
hi, good to see you, what are you doing today?
And I start answering, well, then my thoughts
are suddenly being driven by an external stimulus,
their question, and some internal ideas,
memory of who I am and what I’m doing that day,
so past and present, and so on.
And so thoughts become structured.
So when we have a question
about how to abstain from thoughts,
we need to be additionally specific
and really pinpoint that what we’re trying to do
is to abstain from thoughts we don’t want, presumably,
either because they are too repetitive and distracting,
or because what’s contained in those thoughts is disturbing.
Okay, this is important because it gives us two answers
to the questions that are highly divergent.
One answer to the question of how to abstain
from intrusive thoughts, you know,
thoughts that we’re addicted to,
is if those thoughts are merely on loop all the time,
and we can’t stop them,
but the thoughts themselves aren’t particularly disturbing,
so think about a song you can’t get out of your head,
or you keep recounting some event,
but the event itself isn’t very disturbing,
it’s just intrusive because it’s there.
Well, in that case, the data really point
to trying to anchor your thoughts
to some external stimulus.
So getting into action, getting into activities
that really draw your attention away from that thought.
Now, you may still hear it scrolling in the background,
so you might be sitting in class
still hearing that loop of thoughts in the background.
That’s something that over time ought to wane,
it ought to disappear.
If we try and bring more and more attention
to whatever it is that’s in our environment,
whatever it is that we happen to be learning
or doing physically, et cetera.
Things like mindful meditation,
doing a 10 or even just five-minute-a-day practice
of sitting with eyes closed or lying down with eyes closed
and really focusing on one’s breath,
focusing one’s attention on the,
sometimes it’s called the third eye center,
but in science, we’d say just the region
right behind the forehead,
you’re directing your attention there,
has been shown to increase focus for singular topics
and can improve memory
and do a bunch of other things as well.
Those are data from Dr. Wendy Suzuki’s lab
at New York University.
She was a guest on the podcast as well.
My laboratory has run studies on mindful meditation
as well.
So what you’re really trying to do
is learn how to focus better on one thing
and by focusing on that one thing,
you focus off these repetitive thoughts.
Now, I have a feeling that this question was asked
and that many people upvoted this question
because the issue isn’t just thoughts that are intrusive
because they’re there and on repeat,
but because the thoughts themselves are actually troubling.
This could be recounting a trauma, someone harmed you,
you observed something that was disturbing,
you felt wronged, you felt someone else was wronged,
you can’t seem to get your mind off of something
and your emotions tend to follow.
And so it’s uncomfortable.
I have a feeling this is the root of the question.
In that case, the approach is very different.
What we know from essentially all of the quality scientific
and clinical studies is that those sorts
of intrusive thoughts are very much like a trauma.
Now we have to be clear in defining what trauma is.
I’ll use the definition that Dr. Paul Conti,
another incredible guest that was on our podcast,
a psychiatrist, Stanford Harvard trained psychiatrist,
I think one of the world’s foremost leaders
on the issue of trauma and psychiatry
and psychology generally.
He defines trauma as an event or something
that fundamentally changes the way
that your nervous system works
such that you function less adaptively going forward
from that event.
So not every bad occurrence in your life is a trauma.
That’s good news.
The bad news is many people have traumas
and traumas change the way that our nervous system works
so that we don’t function as well as we could.
So in that sense, intrusive thoughts that are disturbing
are in many ways traumas and are reinforcing that trauma.
Now we know that almost counterintuitively
in order to deal with trauma,
you have to get very close to that trauma.
You don’t have to re-expose
and I would hope you would not re-expose yourself
to the very same trauma,
but we know that one of the best ways to deal with traumas
is to get very clear about the narrative
around those traumas.
Now this can be done with a therapist ideally,
but not everyone has access to therapy
or can afford therapy.
There’s a range of quality of therapists for that matter.
So we’re always referring to the desire for people
to do great therapy with really great,
meaning excellently trained people.
But it turns out that if you want to extinguish
an intrusive thought, one of the best ways to do that
is to journal about that particular thought extensively.
So rather than the earlier strategy for intrusive thoughts
where they’re just on loop and intrusive
because they’re on loop and present,
but their content isn’t disturbing,
when a thought is disturbing and intrusive,
we know that it’s very useful to script out
as much detail about that particular thought
and the things around it as possible.
Obviously you want to do this in a way
that is fairly structured.
So you ideally would use complete sentences.
So the reason for doing that is that thoughts,
as I mentioned earlier, can often be fragmentary.
So they pop up in our mind almost seemingly spontaneously.
They’re inhibiting our ability to focus
or be present to work or family or other things or sleep.
Writing things down in a lot of detail
does seem to have this quality
of both reducing the emotional load
of whatever it is that that thought is about,
as well as diminishing the frequency
of those intrusive thoughts over time.
So this is far and away different
than the strategy I mentioned
for the other types of intrusive thoughts.
And really it’s far and away different
from the 30-day abstinence approach
that Dr. Anna Lembke was talking about
for substance or behavioral addictions.
Now, of course, this process of abstaining from thoughts
or removing the addictive nature of certain thoughts
can definitely take some time.
So a good example there would be superstitions.
You know, I’ll come clean here.
And I’ve talked about this before on a few podcasts
that when I was in college,
I developed a sort of knock on wood superstition.
Anytime I’d say something that I didn’t want to happen
or did want to happen,
I’d say knock on wood and I’d knock on wood.
And then I started suppressing the behavior
mostly because it was a little embarrassing.
And then I started just telling myself in my head,
knock on wood, knock on wood, knock on wood.
And it was clearly a little bit of an OCD type thing.
But again, OCD in air quotes here.
I think it qualified as OCD in the sense
that the more I did it, the more I wanted to do it.
So I needed to go cold turkey on the thinking,
but how can you go cold turkey on a thought?
You couldn’t.
What I was told to do and what worked very well for me
was to just write down the worst possible outcome
that I was concerned about.
So to really get close to the nature
or the underlying basis of that intrusive thought.
And I raised this because a lot of times
the intrusive thought is not,
okay, I’m thinking about a car accident
or I’m thinking about a breakup
or I’m thinking about an exam that I have.
That can be intrusive, but a lot of times
it’s some kind of nebulous, abstract set of words
or ideas or images around something that happened
that we saw or heard or experienced.
And by putting a lot of clear structure
to what the thought is exactly
and to putting some thought and structure onto paper
about what that pattern of not healthy thinking relates to,
people often achieve tremendous relief
in a fairly short amount of time.
Sometimes just in one session of writing it down,
sometimes they need to write it down multiple times.
What you’re essentially trying to do
with a intrusive thought or a trauma of any kind
is you’re trying to turn a disturbing story,
that is a story that evokes a lot of emotion
and captures, it kind of hijacks your nervous system
into what is essentially a known but repetitive
and kind of old, boring story
where the emotional load has been depleted.
And there, of course, I have to highlight the fact
that getting sufficient rapid eye movement sleep,
we also know is very important
for removing the emotional load of traumatic experiences
and intrusive thoughts.
So you really want to strive
to get the best possible sleep you can
that includes sufficient rapid eye movement sleep.
And we have multiple zero cost resources
for that at hubermanlab.com.
We have the episode on master your sleep.
We have the episode on perfect your sleep.
We have the toolkit for sleep, all of which are timestamped
and all of which can be accessed completely zero cost
to try and get your sleep as good as possible,
including lots of rapid eye movement sleep.
So in order to remove intrusive and addictive thoughts,
ask yourself, is this OCD of the classic sense?
If it is, you should see a psychiatrist.
They won’t necessarily prescribe medication,
but there are tools for true OCD
that are very effective in many cases.
And we did the episode on OCD,
which I invite you to listen to as well.
You want to ask yourself, are the thoughts disturbing
or merely intrusive and repetitive?
If they’re merely intrusive and repetitive,
well, then learning to focus your attention
on other things and getting better at focusing
on single things through an exercise
like mindfulness meditation can really help.
And indeed, perhaps the best use of mindfulness meditation
is to improve your level of focus.
It does have other benefits as well,
but that’s going to be the major one
that one will experience even with these very short
five or 10 minute day meditations.
Great data on that from the scientific literature.
And then if those intrusive thoughts are not only intrusive,
but they’re also disturbing, in that case,
you really want to put as much structure
and thought, believe it or not,
into what those thoughts are really about.
Write them out on paper in complete sentences
and maybe do that multiple times
until the underlying emotions related to those thoughts
really start to diminish.
And by doing that,
you’re essentially doing your own form of trauma therapy,
for lack of a better way to put it.
And again, the data really point to the fact
that getting close to the specific details
around those intrusive thoughts
is going to be the best way to extinguish them.
Thank you for joining for the beginning
of this Ask Me Anything episode.
To hear the full episode and to hear future episodes
of these Ask Me Anything sessions,
plus to receive transcripts of them
and transcripts of the Huberman Lab Podcast Standard Channel
and premium tools not released anywhere else,
please go to hubermanlab.com slash premium.
Just to remind you why we launched
the Huberman Lab Podcast Premium Channel.
It’s really twofold.
First of all, it’s to raise support
for the Standard Huberman Lab Podcast Channel,
which of course will still be continued
to be released every Monday in full length.
We are not going to change the format
or anything about the Standard Huberman Lab Podcast
and to fund research,
in particular research done on human beings.
So not animal models, but on human beings,
which I think we all agree is a species
that we are most interested in.
And we are going to specifically fund research
that is aimed toward developing further protocols
for mental health, physical health and performance.
And those protocols will be distributed
through all channels, not just the Premium Channel,
but through all channels,
Huberman Lab Podcast and other media channels.
So the idea here is to give you information
to your burning questions in depth
and allow you the opportunity to support
the kind of research that provides those kinds of answers
in the first place.
Now, an especially exciting feature of the Premium Channel
is that the Tiny Foundation has generously offered
to do a dollar for dollar match
on all funds raised for research
through the Premium Channel.
So this is a terrific way that they’re going to amplify
whatever funds come in through the Premium Channel
to further support research
for science and science-related tools
for mental health, physical health and performance.
If you’d like to sign up
for the Huberman Lab Premium Channel,
again, there’s a cost of $10 per month,
or you can pay $100 upfront for the entire year.
That will give you access to all the AMAs.
You can ask questions and get answers to your questions.
And you’ll of course get answers
to all the questions that other people ask as well.
There will also be some premium content
such as transcripts of the AMAs
and various transcripts and protocols
of Huberman Lab Podcast episodes not found elsewhere.
And again, you’ll be supporting research
for mental health, physical health and performance.
You can sign up for the Premium Channel
by going to hubermanlab.com slash premium.
Again, that’s hubermanlab.com slash premium.
And as always, thank you for your interest in science.
♪♪