Our card this week is Donna Tattersall, the Queen of Spades from Rhode Island.

In 1979, 24-year-old Donna was found dead behind a bar,

a bar that she was seen alone at just hours earlier.

Thanks to eyewitnesses, police quickly zeroed in on a promising suspect.

But when the case went to trial, they learned things weren’t as straightforward as they

seemed.

For more than 40 years, the sexual assault and murder of Donna Tattersall has haunted

the people of Pawtucket, Rhode Island, as they wait for the monster who committed such

a heinous crime to be held accountable.

I’m Ashley Flowers, and this is The Deck.

On April 22, 1979, before Sunday’s service began, a reverend in Pawtucket, Rhode Island

was taking a stroll in the alleyway beside his church.

As he approached the back of the building, something caught his eye in the grassy lawn

behind the Firehouse Lounge, which was a popular bar that sat right behind the church.

It was a woman.

She looked like she had passed out after a long night of drinking, sprawled out on the

ground, so the reverend called police.

But when the responding officer arrived at around 10 a.m., it was clear that the situation

was actually much more serious than that.

The woman on the ground was only half-clothed, and she wasn’t passed out.

She was dead.

Because she was only partially clothed and had some bruising, it was clear right away

that foul play was involved.

Within minutes, the area was closed off and was swarming with detectives, patrol officers,

and the medical examiner.

To everyone’s surprise, one of the patrol officers piped up and said that he knew the

woman.

In fact, he’d just seen her the previous night when he was working patrol at the Firehouse

Lounge.

He knew her name was Donna, but he wasn’t sure of her last name.

He said Donna had been sitting at the bar by herself for the majority of the evening,

and the last time he recalled seeing her was around 12.45 a.m., when she was standing by

the cigarette machine, still alone.

Two more officers said they’d seen Donna at the bar that night, too, but none of them

seemed to recall seeing anything suspicious or even anything useful.

Donna wasn’t with anyone, she wasn’t getting harassed by anyone, or getting into

any fights.

Nothing that would have led to her ending up dead just a few feet away from where she

was enjoying a night out just hours earlier.

So police went to the public, seeking tips.

They were hoping to find someone who could help them piece together what had happened

to Donna between the last sighting of her inside the bar, seemingly having a good time,

and then her ending up dead behind the building.

And a tipster actually came forward right away, giving them exactly what they were looking

for.

26-year-old Pawtucket resident Frank Hallworth was listening to the radio on April 22nd when

he heard reports of what police had discovered.

He heard authorities please for anyone with information to come forward, and that’s

when it clicked.

What he was hearing on the radio must have been directly related to that disturbing thing

that he’d seen the night before.

Frank called police and told them that on the evening of April 21st, he was at the firehouse

lounge having a good time, sipping a drink, and just kind of mingling, when a large man

bumped into him and made him spill his drink all over himself.

Now this wasn’t enough to make Frank like super angry or anything, or maybe he was just

intimidated by this guy because of his size, but it was certainly annoying.

And memorable.

Frank told police that the guy who bumped him was no stranger.

Here’s Detective Sue Cormier.

She’s with the Pawtucket Police Department, and she’s working the case today.

He said that he recognized the person from the area and from the bar.

He didn’t know his full name, but he said his nickname was something like Buzz or Buzzy.

After the spill incident, the night continued on rather uneventfully, and Frank said that

he left the bar at around 1.15 a.m.

He told police that he hopped in his car, and as he was heading home, he drove back

past the bar, and that’s when he saw the man who had bumped into him earlier.

Buzz was walking out of the firehouse lounge and into the alley beside the bar, and he

was carrying something.

Frank called out to him something like, hey man, and when he did, Buzz started walking

much faster toward the alley.

And that’s when Frank realized Buzz wasn’t carrying something, he was carrying someone.

It was a woman that he was holding in like a bear hug.

But Frank said that he honestly didn’t think too much of it at the time.

Now, you might have the same reaction I did when I first heard this, like how do you not

immediately know something is wrong when you see a man carrying a woman down a dark alley?

But Frank said that he just assumed that the woman was drunk.

I mean, he’d seen Buzz at the bar earlier that night, so he assumed the woman had been

there as well, maybe had a bit too much to drink, and she needed help getting home.

Frank also noted that the woman wasn’t screaming or making any kind of commotion, so he just

thought that Buzz knew her and was trying to be a nice guy.

But Frank’s rather innocent justification melted away when he heard the report on the

radio of a woman being found behind the bar.

Now while police were trying to figure out what Buzz’s real name was so they could

interview him, the medical examiner’s office was finishing up Donna’s autopsy.

The ME found that she’d been strangled, likely by hand, and sexually assaulted.

Her toxicology showed that she had a lot of alcohol in her system, which I’m sure

was no surprise to anyone since she’d just spent the entire evening at a bar.

As news of Donna’s murder spread, more and more witnesses started calling in.

Here’s Detective Cormier again.

She was seen by several people that night.

It appears that she was in there for several hours and was drinking quite a bit.

Some people who saw her in the bar that night said she was drunk, but not to the point that

she wouldn’t know who she was with.

Once police had spoken with the family, friends, and people who’d seen her at the bar, they

nailed down a timeline of Donna’s movements the night before her body was found.

She’d arrived at the Firehouse Lounge sometime before 8 p.m., and she sat at the bar drinking

by herself for a few hours.

There was a live band that night, and Donna seemed to be enjoying the music.

And by the way, the Firehouse Lounge wasn’t some little dive bar, it’s this huge place

with multiple levels and a big dance floor and stages for bands.

At some point during the evening, Donna was seen talking with a group of people.

Then later that night was when the officer saw her standing by the cigarette machine alone.

And around 1.15 a.m. is when she was seen leaving the bar, but not alone, and not of

her own volition.

Just like Frank had told police, other patrons reported seeing Donna leave with a big, tall

man being carried by him, in fact.

Unfortunately, none of the officers who were there at the bar on duty that night witnessed

this, which surprised me, but maybe they were making rounds through the crowds when Donna

was taken out of the doors, maybe they weren’t paying attention, who knows?

Either way, now that several other people had confirmed Frank’s initial statement,

investigators were sure that this mystery man existed and likely had something to do

with Donna’s murder, but they still needed to figure out his identity.

So they called up their initial tipster, Frank, and asked him to come down to the station

and look at a photo lineup to see if he could ID the man that he saw carrying Donna that

night.

And sure enough, he could.

Frank confidently pointed to a photo of the man that he saw that night who he knew as

Buzz.

It was 20-year-old David Bland.

Within a few days, police had tracked down David, or Buzz as he was known, but there

was one small problem.

Even though he was their prime suspect, he had an alibi.

Buzz told investigators that he couldn’t have been the guy seen carrying Donna out

of the bar in the wee hours of the morning on April 22nd because he wasn’t even in

town that night.

He told police that he was in Providence, about a 10-minute drive away at a bar called

Lupo’s Heartbreak Hotel.

Buzz also said that he’d never even seen Donna or interacted with her before in his

life.

But investigators weren’t buying his story, partially because his body was covered in

marks consistent with someone trying to fight him off.

There were noticeable scratches and cuts on his legs, but Buzz had an easy explanation

for those scrapes.

He said that while he was at Lupo’s, he’d gotten into a fight with some guy.

As suspicious as they were of Buzz, police let him go since they didn’t have enough

probable cause to arrest him.

That is, until police set out to try and confirm his alibi.

They interviewed 22-year-old Manuel Pimentel, a good friend of Buzz’s, and Manuel claimed

that he was out with Buzz that night, but the story he told police completely contradicted

the tale Buzz had told.

Manuel said that he was taking a taxi cab from Providence to Pawtucket when he spotted

a friend of his, Buzz, and Buzz was standing on the side of the road, appearing to be having

car trouble.

Wanting to help a friend, Manuel had the taxi driver pull up to the broken-down car and

pick up his friend.

Buzz hopped in, and then he and Manuel took the cab to Pawtucket, specifically to a restaurant

called Howard Johnson’s, where they got milkshakes and french fries.

Once they finished at the restaurant, the night was still young, so they agreed to go

to a popular nearby bar, the Firehouse Lounge.

But what’s more, Manuel confirmed that they actually saw Donna at the bar.

Now Manuel says that he wasn’t at the bar too long because he decided to go to another

pub with his other friend.

They invited Buzz to join them, but Manuel said he declined.

Manuel estimated that he and his other friend left the Firehouse Lounge at around 1245 in

the morning, and that’s the last that he saw of Buzz that night.

Police showed Manuel a photo array to see if he could identify his friend Buzz, who

he picked up in the taxi that evening.

And sure enough, he pointed to the picture of David Beland.

Police also reached out to Lupo’s Heartbreak Hotel to see if they could talk to the doorman

who was working the evening of April 21st.

And just as they suspected, when police located the employee and showed him a picture of Buzz,

he said that he’d never seen that guy before in his life.

What’s more, the doorman said that on the night in question, there was only one fight

that he knew of that went down at Lupo’s, and it certainly didn’t involve the guy in

the photo.

So now, armed with Frank’s statement, along with Manuel’s story and the doorman’s account,

investigators were more confident than ever that Buzz was their guy.

I mean, police didn’t really have any other viable suspects or even persons of interest.

All signs were pointing toward Buzz.

And Donna wasn’t the kind of person who had a long list of enemies.

By all accounts, it seems she was very well liked.

You know, nobody has a bad word to say about her.

Just kind of your average 20-something-year-old kid, and I say kid because that just seems

so young to me.

And, you know, to have her life taken from her like that, she was just out to have a

fun time, you know, at a local bar with friends or even just by herself.

She obviously felt comfortable enough being there, whether she was by herself or ran into

other people from the neighborhood.

Everybody seemed to kind of know each other a lot back then, you know, from the city and

neighboring towns.

In order to avoid getting tunnel vision for Buzz, police did all the routine interviews

with Donna’s friends and family members to make sure she hadn’t been targeted by someone

else.

Investigators learned that Donna lived most of her life in Lincoln, a smaller town just

five miles outside of Pawtucket.

She then moved to Pawtucket in 1978, just one year before her death.

She was between jobs and shared an apartment with a random roommate who didn’t know Donna

very well.

But Detective Cormier said that Donna’s family was well-known and well-liked within the Providence

County area.

The more police learned about Donna, the less likely it seemed that anyone had it out for

her.

And the more likely it seemed that the only scenario that made sense was that she was

killed by their prime suspect, Buzz.

Authorities knew that they could place Buzz at the firehouse lounge at around the time

Donna was killed, and they also had a witness who actually saw Buzz carrying Donna down

the alley.

So you might imagine they were pretty confident that they’d win in a jury trial.

That is, if Buzz didn’t just confess or plead guilty first.

But Buzz wasn’t flipping.

So not long after that, he was formally charged with first-degree murder, and Rhode Island

Assistant Attorney General Maureen McKenna prepared to bring the state’s case against

him.

Buzz’s trial was held in Providence at the Superior Court with a jury of seven women

and five men.

The state presented their case first with a solid lineup of witnesses, Manuel, Frank,

the ME, and others.

Manuel was called to the stand first, and he told the court the same story that he told

police when he was initially interviewed.

He was taking a taxi, he spotted Buzz on the side of the road, and asked the taxi driver

to pick him up.

Manuel testified that Buzz didn’t look like he’d been in a fight, which the prosecutor

used as a way to prove that Buzz’s injuries must have occurred later, perhaps while he

was assaulting Donna.

Manuel went on to say that after he picked him up, they went to the popular restaurant

and then ended up at Firehouse Lounge to, quote, pick up a couple of broads, end quote.

Manuel noted that Buzz reeked of liquor and was having trouble walking straight.

According to local coverage of the trial, Manuel described Buzz as, quote-unquote, bombed.

Now remember, Buzz initially completely denied ever even being at the bar the evening that

Donna was killed.

And it was important for the prosecution to prove that Buzz’s initial story was a lie,

that he was at the Firehouse Lounge that night, not at Lupo’s, as he had claimed.

Because here’s the thing, if he was flat out lying about that, what else was he hiding?

As a mudslinging tactic, Buzz’s attorney, Joseph Caponieri, made sure that the jury

knew that Manuel had a criminal record.

He’d previously been convicted of breaking and entering and larceny.

The judge told the jury that just because someone has a criminal record doesn’t mean

that they’re not telling the truth.

But he did let them know that it was something that they could take into consideration when

evaluating the credibility of a witness.

Now to further prove that Buzz was lying, the prosecution called the doorman at Lupo’s

to the stand.

He told the jury then exactly what he told police, he’d never seen Buzz at Lupo’s before.

And Buzz certainly didn’t get into a fight at the bar that night, as he had claimed.

The prosecution had done their best to prove that Buzz was lying about where he’d been

that night.

But they still needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Buzz was the one who strangled

Donna.

And that’s where Frank came in.

Frank got on the stand and recounted to the jury what he’d seen that evening, Buzz carrying

Donna down the alleyway in what he described as a bear hug, and then picking up his pace

when Frank called out to him.

Finally, the prosecution called to the stand the M.E., Dr. Anthony Burns.

He testified to the findings of the autopsy and the fact that there was evidence to support

that Donna had the pressure of hands on her neck.

He was asked if the neck injuries could have been from an impact such as a fall, perhaps

meaning that Donna’s death was an accident, but Dr. Burns said there was no way her injuries

were sustained from a fall.

When it was the defense’s turn to call witnesses, the first person Buzz’s attorney called to

the stand was actually a bit surprising.

It was Buzz himself.

It’s common for attorneys to discourage their clients from testifying at their own hearing

for fear that they might say something incriminating on the stand or melt under the pressure of

cross-examination.

It’s unclear if Joseph Kapaneri discouraged Buzz from testifying or not, but whatever

the case, Buzz was now taking the stand in his own defense, and it’s obvious from the

headlines in 1980 that local newspapers were eating it up.

Some reports from the Providence Journal stated that, just like he had months prior when police

were questioning him, Buzz recounted to the court his whereabouts on the evening of April

21st through the early morning hours of the 22nd.

Only this time, his story was different.

According to those same local newspaper reports, Buzz told the jury that he was not drunk that

night as Manuel had suggested.

And despite the testimony of the doorman, Buzz said that he was at Lupo’s that evening.

He said he had one or two beers and then left after getting in a scuffle, again contradicting

what the doorman who was working that night said.

After leaving Lupo’s, Buzz said that his car stalled on Interstate 95, where he was

picked up by his friend Manuel in the taxi cab.

Buzz now said that the two of them went to a local restaurant for a shake and fries and

then dropped by the Firehouse Lounge.

But where his story diverges from Manuel’s is that Buzz says after he was at the bar

for just a few minutes, he decided to walk home.

He flat out denied ever seeing Frank at the bar that evening or bumping into him, and

he swore up and down that he didn’t know Donna at all and didn’t so much as see her

that night, let alone kill her.

But Buzz didn’t stop there.

He said that he couldn’t have sexually assaulted Donna because he was unable to have sex due

to a sexually transmitted disease that he was battling.

After Buzz testified, the next witness he called to the stand was a woman named Denise.

She says that she was upstairs at Lupo’s Heartbreak Hotel in Providence on the evening of the

21st when she saw Buzz walking in.

Once again, this conflicted with the doorman’s testimony that he’d never seen Buzz in his

life and that he wasn’t at the establishment that night.

But here’s the thing, Denise didn’t just tell the jury that she’d seen Buzz.

She actually said she went up and talked to him for about five minutes.

She said that Buzz showed no signs of being inebriated, which, again, contradicted Manuel’s

testimony that Buzz was completely wasted.

After this, the defense pretty much rested their case, and it was time for closing arguments.

Mr. McKenna was up first, and she reminded the jury of Buzz’s pattern of lies, his

changing story of where he was the night that Donna was killed.

And she also argued that Buzz’s sexual condition wouldn’t have prevented him from forcing

himself on Donna as Buzz had insinuated on the stand.

She agreed that sexually assaulting Donna might have been painful for Buzz, but not

impossible, especially if he was drunk like Manuel had testified.

In Joseph Caponeri’s closing arguments, he focused on chipping away at the state’s

witnesses’ credibility.

He called Frank, the man who saw Buzz carrying Donna out of the bar that night of the murder,

a quote, wise guy.

And he reiterated that another key witness, Manuel, had a criminal record and wasn’t

telling the truth about Buzz being wasted that night.

Joseph implied that Frank and Manuel were likely getting a sweet deal from police in

exchange for their stories about Buzz.

Once the closing arguments were finished, the judge sent the jury off for deliberation.

He reminded them that should they find Buzz guilty, they could bring a verdict of first-degree

murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter.

According to reporting by the Providence Journal, after 12 hours of deliberation, the jury had

reached a verdict.

With everything from manslaughter to first-degree murder on the table, they found the defendant

not guilty.

Across the board.

Buzz was a free man.

But even though he was found not guilty in the court of law, the community of Pawtucket

wasn’t so quick to acquit.

Most of the locals that are still around from this case are still adamant when you talk

to them today that he was responsible.

By the time Buzz’s trial was over in November of 1980, the investigation into Donna’s murder

came to a screeching halt.

I mean, going into the trial, police were confident that they had their guy.

So when the trial was over, they didn’t even have any other leads to follow, let alone

any other viable suspects to look into.

So with that, not even a year after her murder, Donna’s case went cold.

And it would stay that way for decades.

In 2019, Detective Cormier inherited the case.

And even though Donna’s murder was one of the coldest cases Pawtucket had at this point,

she wanted to take a shot at warming it up.

She revisited several witnesses who were interviewed all those decades ago to hear their stories

firsthand.

I have talked to some people that were named back then, including Frank, that still stand

by their story and still are adamant that that was the truth and that they did see him

with her.

They saw him with her in the alley.

Detective Cormier told us that she managed to get the samples from Donna’s sexual assault

examination.

Even though the slides were four decades old at that point, she was hopeful that they’d

preserve the DNA.

But unfortunately, some parts of the samples were degraded, making it impossible to do

testing.

Detective Cormier says that she’s still working on the possibility of sending the slides to

a private lab that has newer technology available.

But like all DNA testing, it comes with a pretty big price tag.

And securing the funds is no quick or easy task.

Donna’s died in 2005, and it’s possible that the truth of what happened in the early morning

hours of April 22nd, 1979, died with him.

But that doesn’t mean Detective Cormier is giving up.

She said that despite Donna’s case being decades old, the young woman whose life was snuffed

out far too soon hasn’t been forgotten by the community.

On my Facebook page, I get a lot of private messages.

So I post things and people will comment, you know, they remembered her, oh, you know,

she babysat me or whatever years ago.

But then I get a lot of private messages from people.

Detective Cormier says she looks into every message about Donna that lands in her inbox.

Because you never know when the person holding the key to the truth will come forward.

Sometimes people sit with these things, and whether they were young at the time, and their

families told them, you know, don’t get involved, or, and sometimes people were in fear of the

suspects, so they didn’t come forward.

And now, you know, 20, 30 years later, they’re not afraid of these people.

They don’t even live in the same state.

So sometimes people come forward or call my tip line and say to me, listen, I don’t know

if this helps or not, but this is what I remember from then.

So, you know, I like to hear from everybody.

And I do like to hear from people who knew the victim, because I want to know just as

much about how they lived as I do about how they died.

That’s just as important to me, because you can’t figure out who killed them if you don’t

know what their lifestyle was.

Just recently, Detective Cormier received a message from someone who wanted to be a

confidential informant.

They said that they were just a teenager when Donna was killed, but they had information

that they wanted to share with her.

Detective Cormier wouldn’t share with us what the informant said, since the lead is

still being actively investigated.

But she said that the person has provided quite a bit of new information about Buzz.

Information that could prove useful to the investigation.

I’ve been asked before why I work on cases where the suspect is dead.

And again, it’s not for the sense of prosecution.

It’s because I can go and tell a family, put a face to it, that this is who took your loved

one from you.

And sometimes I can’t give them the why, because a lot of people want to know why.

Why my sister?

Why?

It’d be great to be able to provide that, but you can’t always.

But if I can at least say who, that would help.

The fact that somebody got away with it and was still walking around while the victim

lost their life.

And the other part of it for me is, if that were my mom, my sister, my child, I would

want to know that somebody was still working on that case and not just letting it go because

new cases come in.

That victim and that family deserve justice.

And that’s kind of what motivates me.

Donna’s life was just beginning when it was snatched away from her more than 40 years

ago.

She still deserves justice, whether her killer is roaming free or not, her family deserves

answers.

It’s so sad to think that someone got away with sexually assaulting and killing her,

let alone just steps away from a crowded bar.

If you know anything about the murder of Donna Tattersall in the early morning hours of April

22nd, 1979, please call the Pawtucket Police Department at 401-727-9100.

Or you can call the Rhode Island tip line at 877-RI-SOLVED.

That’s 877-747-6583.

The Deck is an AudioChuck production with theme music by Ryan Lewis.

To learn more about The Deck and our advocacy work, visit thedeckpodcast.com.

So what do you think, Chuck?

Do you approve?